Hi Kieran,
We don't, but I've done some profiling in the past, Docker itself should
have negligible impact.
The two things that might be slowing things down:
1) The docker images don't bundle jemalloc (http://jemalloc.net/),
which can speed things up by 10-15%
2) osrm-contract is very CPU intensive - the more threads you give it,
the faster it will run. Give it more if you can.
256GB of RAM should be more than enough to avoid swapping, but you might
want to disable swap to be sure - if it's being used, it will have a huge
impact on speed.
daniel
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 2:30 AM, Kieran Caplice <kieran.capl...@temetra.com>
wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> Can you clarify if you use Docker at Mapbox? What kind of server do you
> guys have (if not the one described on the wiki page)?
>
> Over night, the process has gone to just 75% complete from 65% yesterday -
> 41 hours in total now, and back to maxing CPU again.
>
> Kind regards,
> Kieran Caplice
>
> On 21/09/17 17:17, Daniel Patterson wrote:
>
> OSRM supports *two* core routing algorithms - CH and MLD. The
> `osrm-contract` tool generates the CH dataset, but you can use the MLD
> pipeline instead with:
>
> osrm-extract -p profiles/bicycle.lua yourmap.osm.pbf
> osrm-partition yourmap.osrm
> osrm-customize yourmap.osrm
> osrm-routed -a MLD yourmap.osrm
>
> This sequence of tools should be significantly quicker than osrm-contract
> - the price you pay is that routing requests are about 5x slower (still
> pretty fast though!). The reason that MLD exists is for the
> `osrm-customize` step - it allows you to import traffic data very quickly
> and update the routing graph (~1 minute for North America).
>
> It's hard to say exactly what's going wrong with osrm-contract here - here
> at Mapbox, we daily run `osrm-contract` over the latest planet with the
> bicycle profile without a problem, however, Alex and others have reported
> issues with what seem like hangs on much smaller datasets that we've been
> unable to reproduce so far.
>
> The runtime of osrm-contract is affected by how much hierarchy exists in
> the data - the more similar the edge speeds (like in foot) and the more
> edges there are, the slower it gets, often in a non-linear fashion. The
> car profile has a very hierarchical structure (many different road speeds),
> so it fits well into the CH, the construction algorithm doesn't need to
> compare as many options.
>
> daniel
>
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Kieran Caplice <
> kieran.capl...@temetra.com> wrote:
>
>> We're actually looking for the best of both car and foot, so in my head,
>> bicycle would be the happy medium (though I could be completely wrong on
>> this).
>> Kind regards,
>> Kieran Caplice
>>
>> On 21/09/17 16:53, Alex Farioletti wrote:
>>
>> i've run into the same issues, and now i just use metroextracts of the
>> areas that i need for the bike stuff i do and it reduces the time
>> significantly
>>
>> *Alex Farioletti*
>> *415.312.1674*
>> *tcbcourier.com <http://tcbcourier.com> *
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Kieran Caplice <
>> kieran.capl...@temetra.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Daniel.
>>>
>>> I'm using the bicycle profile, so I would expect based on what you've
>>> said that somewhere up to 36 hours would be likely. However, this is the
>>> current output, after 25h40m:
>>> [info] Input file: /data/1505492056/planet-latest.osrm
>>> [info] Threads: 12
>>> [info] Reading node weights.
>>> [info] Done reading node weights.
>>> [info] Loading edge-expanded graph representation
>>> [info] merged 2379332 edges out of 1777752432
>>> [info] initializing node priorities... ok.
>>> [info] preprocessing 389797971 (90%) nodes...
>>> [info] . 10% . 20% . 30% . 40% . 50% . 60%
>>>
>>> It hasn't advanced past 60% in the last 2-3 hours. It is however maxing
>>> CPU and using approximately the same amount of RAM since it started.
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Kieran Caplice
>>>
>>> On 21/09/17 16:39, Daniel Patterson wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Kieran,
>>>
>>> The contraction time will be slow - many, many hours for the whole
>>> planet. *Typically* for the car profile it's about 12 hours, but if you
>>> use bike or foot, or your own profile, it can get a lot bigger.
>>>
>>> If you've messed with the travel speeds, that can have a big effect
>>> too. 24 hours is not unheard of, but whether it's legit will depend a lot
>>> on the details.
>>>
>>> daniel
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:00 AM, Kieran Caplice <
>>> kieran.capl...@temetra.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Could anyone give an approx estimate for the time required to run the
>>>> osrm-contract on planet data on a 12 thread, 256 GB RAM, SSD machine?
>>>>
>>>> The osrm-extract process finished in 232 minutes, but the contract has
>>>> now been running solid for 24 hours, and appears to be stuck at 60% on
>>>> "preprocessing nodes". All 12 cores are generally maxed out, and the
>>>> process is using nearly 90 GB of RAM.
>>>>
>>>> This is the second time I've run the contract process, as my SSH
>>>> connection to the server dropped the first time and the process wasn't
>>>> running in a screen etc, so I assumed after the 40-odd hours it was running
>>>> for, the connection drop caused it to hang, but now I'm not so sure. Were
>>>> there any files I should maybe have cleared before trying to run it again?
>>>>
>>>> I'm using the docker image to run the command (using
>>>> osrm/osrm-backend:latest): time docker run -t -v /opt/osrm/data:/data
>>>> osrm/osrm-backend osrm-contract /data/1505492056/planet-latest.osrm
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>> Kieran Caplice
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OSRM-talk mailing list
>>>> OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org
>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OSRM-talk mailing
>>> listOSRM-talk@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OSRM-talk mailing list
>>> OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OSRM-talk mailing
>> listOSRM-talk@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OSRM-talk mailing list
>> OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSRM-talk mailing
> listOSRM-talk@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSRM-talk mailing list
> OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
>
>
_______________________________________________
OSRM-talk mailing list
OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
