Thanks! But this case I sent, the route osrm without traffic is picking is way longer and slower.
My server is taking a long detour instead of the obvious direct route demo server is taking. It does not seem to be a real traffic data issue in this case. It looks more like a difference in routing algorithm or in road graph data. On Fri, Sep 14, 2018, 11:26 AM Frédéric Rodrigo <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > The demo server use in addition private Mapbox real-time traffic data. > > Frédéric. > > > Le 14/09/2018 à 19:43, Jose Florido a écrit : > > Hi! > > > > I just deployed your docker images on a new server and started osrm > > backed with latest data for Louisiana from Geofabrik. > > > > I am finding a big difference in routing for some cases, compared to > > the running demo server at project-osrm.org > > > > For example this route: > > > > > http://map.project-osrm.org/?z=10¢er=29.871611%2C-90.144196&loc=29.595770%2C-90.719535&loc=29.949932%2C-90.070116&hl=en&alt=0 > > > > > http://104.248.79.106:9966/?z=10¢er=29.871611%2C-90.144196&loc=29.595770%2C-90.719535&loc=29.949932%2C-90.070116&hl=en&alt=0 > > > > Clearly demo server does a better job routing here. > > > > I am running the docker images right out of the box. MLD algo and > > processing data with extract, partition and customize steps. I did not > > modify the car.lua profile. > > > > Any idea why is there such a difference? > > > > Thanks! > > Jose > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OSRM-talk mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk > > >
_______________________________________________ OSRM-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
