On Monday 02 June 2008 22:19:07 Romain Beauxis wrote: > Le Monday 02 June 2008 15:13:17 Yair K., vous avez écrit : > > > soundcard.h is under GPL too. However in the hg tree it says released > > > under BSD. > > > > It would be nice if it were under BSD. Anyone who really wants a BSD > > licensed version can get it anyway, and it stops silly questions about what > > happens if apps use it (e.g. > > http://4front-tech.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=6671#6671 ). > > I guess the problem can come for the kernel modules. > > I'm not sure it's allowed to have a BSD licence for a kernel module, but I > might be wrong. >
I'm talking only about soundcard.h. Kernel-userland interfaces do not count as "derived work" per FSF, etc. So a closed program can run a GPL kernel. (Headers shouldn't count either, but I'm not entirely sure about that). Yours, Yair K. _______________________________________________ oss-devel mailing list oss-devel@mailman.opensound.com http://mailman.opensound.com/mailman/listinfo/oss-devel