On June 2, 2026 11:41:33 PM GMT+03:00, Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> wrote: >From the talk I linked to, for BIRD from the start of 2026 up to 19 May, >that was *70*. The ones I've seen (not for BIRD) they're often extremely >verbose, and they're often plain wrong (the talk suggests ~ 9% of the >reports for BIRD were valid). > >At this point I think it is fairly reasonable for small development >teams to not spend all that much time researching a lower-effort >report. If it's valid there will likely be a handful of duplicate >reports coming along soon afterwards anyway, and hopefully one of >those may have done more triage before sending out. > If somebody writes he doesn't currently plan to do something, that means only that, nothing else. Everything else is a pure speculation, not an established fact.
Sincerely Yours, Dan.
