I was getting those messages and fixed the problem by verifying the
entry for the client key in the client.keys file on the server and the
agent to ensure that they matched.  I had one letter off of what was
expected.
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of gentuxx
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 11:23 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ossec-list] Re: ossec-remoted misreporting


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

gentuxx wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I've got one agent that is being reported as not allowed by
> ossec-remoted on the server.  It is whitelisted in the server config.
> 
> Any ideas on why this might be happening and/or how to troubleshoot
it?
> 


Sorry for the repeated self-posts.....

Now, I'm getting the following entries in ossec.log:

2006/08/24 09:19:49 ossec-remoted(1403): Incorrectly formated message
from '192.168.0.200'.
2006/08/24 09:19:49 ossec-remoted(1403): Incorrectly formated message
from '192.168.0.200'.
2006/08/24 09:19:49 ossec-remoted(1403): Incorrectly formated message
from '192.168.0.200'.
2006/08/24 09:19:49 ossec-remoted(1403): Incorrectly formated message
from '192.168.0.200'.
2006/08/24 09:19:49 ossec-remoted(1403): Incorrectly formated message
from '192.168.0.200'.
2006/08/24 09:19:49 ossec-remoted(1406): Checksum mismatch on message
from '192.168.0.200'.
2006/08/24 09:19:49 ossec-remoted(1403): Incorrectly formated message
from '192.168.0.200'.
2006/08/24 09:19:52 ossec-remoted(1403): Incorrectly formated message
from '192.168.0.200'.
2006/08/24 09:19:52 ossec-remoted(1403): Incorrectly formated message
from '192.168.0.200'.
2006/08/24 09:19:52 ossec-remoted(1403): Incorrectly formated message
from '192.168.0.200'.
2006/08/24 09:19:52 ossec-remoted(1403): Incorrectly formated message
from '192.168.0.200'.


Since the comms between server and agent are encrypted, sniffing the
traffic won't work.  The only thing I can think of is that the agent is
a SPARC system and the server is x86.  Would this make any difference in
terms of "endian-ness" or anything like that?  (IIRC SPARC's are
big-endian and x86's are little-endian.)

Both are running gentoo linux and ossec-0.9-1.
- --
gentux
echo "hfouvyyAhnbjm/dpn" | perl -pe 's/(.)/chr(ord($1)-1)/ge'

gentux's gpg fingerprint ==> 5495 0388 67FF 0B89 1239  D840 4CF0 39E2
18D3 4A9E
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFE7dJ6TPA54hjTSp4RAl+rAJ0dYb+ZcLSSmMs2zfnl1HaA2+5QhACfQ1A4
eAtU1g/Zo6VYJwauIIv6Sc8=
=p16o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

This electronic mail (including any attachments) may contain information that 
is privileged, confidential, and/or otherwise protected from disclosure to 
anyone other than its intended recipient(s). Any dissemination or use of this 
electronic email or its contents (including any attachments) by persons other 
than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply email so that we 
may correct our internal records. Please then delete the original message 
(including any attachments) in its entirety. Thank you.


Reply via email to