Is it possible to have both services (syslogd and ossec) running on the
same box and looking for traffic from the same devices?  My PIX only
allows me to output on one port.  If I configure syslogd to see it,
ossec will not see it.  The syslogd service always starts before the
ossec-remoted process on my box, so the only way for ossec to pick it up
is to do it on a port that syslog is not monitoring or turn syslog off
altogether on the server.  If I could somehow configure both to work, I
would be a really happy individual.  I suppose I could have a second NIC
listening to a SPAN port, but there has to be a single NIC solution
somehow, I think.  I hope.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of gentuxx
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 12:12 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ossec-list] Re: Remote syslog configuration question


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Marty E. Hillman wrote:
> You should not have a syslog server on Penguin.  If you do, it is
> intercepting the message before ossec can see it.  If you configure
> Gateway and Media to use a different port for syslog, configure
> ossec.conf on Penguin to listen to the new port.  You can either use
> ossec or syslogd to listen to the syslog messages on the server ? not
both.
> 
>  
> 
> Try this article in the FAQ to see if it helps you. 
> http://www.ossec.net/wiki/index.php/Know_How:Syslog_Config
> 

Not having read the article, another suggestion might be to log remote
data to a different file.  IOW, use syslog to do the sepration of log
events, and then have ossec monitor the alternate log file as a normal
syslog file.  I'm doing this for a couple of systems, that I'm unable to
install ossec on because of differences in glibc (IIRC).



>  
> 
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> *From:* [email protected]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *On Behalf Of *Johnny Stork
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 21, 2006 2:49 PM
> *To:* ossec-list
> *Subject:* [ossec-list] Remote syslog configuration question
> 
>  
> 
> I just setup ossec on three machines as follows
> 
>  
> 
> Penguin (RHES4) Installed as "server"
> Gateway (RHES4) Installed as "agent"
> Media (CentOS 4.4) Installed as "agent".
> 
>  
> 
> So far so good, agents and keys all setup as per instructions and when
> starting ossec on Server1, I get what looks like the correct response
> and indication of communication with the agents, from the
> /var/ossec/logs/ossec.log on Penguin, the "Server" install.
> 
>  
> 
> 2006/09/21 12:30:55 ossec-remoted: Assigning counter for agent
Gateway:
> '0:6480'.
> 2006/09/21 12:30:55 ossec-remoted: Assigning counter for agent Media:
> '0:1070'.
> 2006/09/21 12:30:55 ossec-remoted: Assigning sender counter: 0:1068
> 
>  
> 
> Now both Gateway and Media send syslog to Penguin, which is running as
> the "server". When I try to login to either Gateway or Media via SSH
and
> intentionally use a bad password, the syslog on Penguin shows the
> correct failures, but this does not seem to be caught by ossec? Have I
> missed something in the configuration with regards to having the
server
> install as the main syslog monitor?
> 
>  
> 
> Sep 21 12:47:44 media sshd(pam_unix)[18133]: authentication failure;
> logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=somehost.somedomain.ca
user=root
> 
>  
> 
> Any suggestions?
> 
> This electronic mail (including any attachments) may contain
information
> that is privileged, confidential, and/or otherwise protected from
> disclosure to anyone other than its intended recipient(s). Any
> dissemination or use of this electronic email or its contents
(including
> any attachments) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
please
> notify us immediately by reply email so that we may correct our
internal
> records. Please then delete the original message (including any
> attachments) in its entirety. Thank you.
> 


- --
gentux
echo "hfouvyyAhnbjm/dpn" | perl -pe 's/(.)/chr(ord($1)-1)/ge'

gentux's gpg fingerprint ==> 5495 0388 67FF 0B89 1239  D840 4CF0 39E2
18D3 4A9E
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFE3C2TPA54hjTSp4RAuglAJ0aNYMko2I0sxo+BvJZUVY47IsZ0gCg1/F5
45mecu2MrLcOiGARdavebbs=
=3btS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to