Hi Pete,

I think your problem is really related to moving the ossec installs
around. To properly remove it,
just:

1-Stop the ossec processes
2-Remove the /var/ossec directory
3-Remove /etc/ossec-init.conf

As for syscheck, all its data is stored at /var/ossec/queue/syscheck.
So, if you remove any file
stored in there (after stopping ossec), you should clean it up.

Hope it helps.

--
Daniel B. Cid
dcid ( at ) ossec.net

On Jan 18, 2008 10:40 AM, Peter Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> We haven't touched configuration in internal_options nor in syscheck
> configs and had been running fine for over 2 years then bam!
>
> As part of the syscheck, is there some internal store of data which has
> gotten into a mess? If so, can I delete it and restart?
>
> thanks
>
> Pete
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 10:17 -0200, Rodrigo Montoro (Sp0oKeR) wrote:
> >   Hi Peter,
> >     Try some tunning at /var/ossec/etc/internal_options.conf
> >     And which directories are you checking with syscheck?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Rodrigo Montoro (Sp0oKeR)
> >
> >
> > On Jan 18, 2008 7:33 AM, Peter Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi OSSEC has been doing a great job for us on around 7 Debian and Ubuntu
> > > servers for the last few years. Thank you !!
> > >
> > > However recently whilst doing some maintenance and server rebuilds we
> > > have run into problems on 2 machines were we get CPU hitting 90% for
> > > like 4 days either on analysisd or syscheckd.  On one machine (the OSSEC
> > > server) we removed a large amount of backup ~20 G. On the other machine
> > > (ossec client to this server) we moved the OSSEC install directory.
> > >
> > > Somehow I think the processes are trying to figure out where all this
> > > data has gone.
> > >
> > > We were running on ver 1.2 so I have upgraded to 1.4 using tarball but
> > > problem happens after a few days. Do you have any solution or guidance
> > > on how to effectively remove ossec and re-install?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Pete
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to