Hi Donald,

Which version of OSSEC are you using (on the agent and server)? If
this message is appearing at the sever side,
can you show us the output of /var/ossec/queue/shared ? It means that
the agent is sending an improper formated
message (not \n terminated), which might be caused by a truncated
output (I only saw this in the past when the
shared directory had a very large amount of files).

*btw, how often are you seeing those?
**is your first issue resolved?

Thanks,

--
Daniel B. Cid
dcid ( at ) ossec.net





On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 4:13 AM, Donald Tabone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Anyone seen this behavior before and managed to resolve it ?
>
> On Sep 16, 10:54 am, "Donald Tabone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Whilst we have suppressed the rule <1002> from sending email alerts, we also
>> noticed the following log entry is /var/log/ossec.log
>>
>> 2008/09/16 01:47:50 ossec-remoted: Invalid message from '10.31.19.33'
>> (strchr \n)
>>
>> Has this got anything to do with syslog-ng/ossec generating errors.
>>
>> 2008/9/16 Donald Tabone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> > Dear all,
>>
>> > We're experiencing this randomly generated error after we fire-up
>> > ossec. It is tending to flood our email box with alerts.
>>
>> > Sep 15 10:03:32 captain syslog-ng[22504]: I/O error occurred while
>> > reading; fd='69', error='Connection reset by peer (104)'
>>
>> > From some research we've done, using lsof the file descriptor (fd)
>> > number corresponds at any one point in time to a number of other files
>> > with different permissions. Through logical deduction we think that it
>> > is possible that when ossec tries to check a file on a particular
>> > channel, the file would have already been closed and hence the
>> > connection is reset. Are off track with this line of thinking?
>>
>> > We also referenced
>> >http://www.ossec.net/wiki/index.php/Know_How:Email_Alerts_below_7
>> > and tried to tweak a rule as explained in the wiki entry - but this
>> > did not work. The result atm is that ossec service is stopped.
>>
>> > The questions we ask:
>>
>> > How can we accurately pinpoint whether ossec is the problem or not?
>> > Is this a false positive? ie. can it be ignored or is there a
>> > significant problem in the system we actually need to resolve?
>>
>> > We are running ossec 1.6 on a debian4 machine. (same error occured
>> > with 1.5.1)
>>
>> > Can someone assist in finding a solution?
>> > TY
>

Reply via email to