I agree that would be a huge help for me and my deployment as well.
> Any idea on how I can get Access to show real value instead of %%1538
> and so on?
>
> thanks
>
> On Oct 31, 12:06 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Looking at the logs my Windows-Ossec agent send:
>>
>> 2008/10/31 12:57:21 ossec-agent: DEBUG: Sending message to server:
>> 'WinEvtLog: Security: AUDIT_SUCCESS(560): Security: Administrator:
>> GONAPASMG01: GONAPASMG01: Object Open: Object Server: Security
>> Object Type: File Object Name: C:\checkme\New Text Document
>> (4).txt Handle ID: 1340 Operation ID: {0,794511700}
>> Process ID: 3596 Image File Name: C:\MSWD\explorer.exe
>> Primary
>> User Name: Administrator Primary Domain: GONAPASMG01 Primary
>> Logon ID: (0x0,0x2F40576F) Client User Name: - Client Domain:
>> - Client Logon ID: - Accesses: %%1538
>> %%1541
>> %%4416
>> %%4417 %%4418
>>
>> %%4419 %%4420
>> %%4423 %%4424
>> Privileges: - Restricted Sid Count:
>> 0 Access Mask:
>> 0x12019F '
>>
>> Accesses is missing. Here is the copy of the same log copy from
>> Windows Event log.
>>
>> Event Type: Success Audit
>> Event Source: Security
>> Event Category: Object Access
>> Event ID: 560
>> Date: 10/31/2008
>> Time: 12:57:19 PM
>> User: GONAPASMG01\Administrator
>> Computer: GONAPASMG01
>> Description:
>> Object Open:
>> Object Server: Security
>> Object Type: File
>> Object Name: C:\checkme\New Text Document (4).txt
>> Handle ID: 1340
>> Operation ID: {0,794511700}
>> Process ID: 3596
>> Image File Name: C:\MSWD\explorer.exe
>> Primary User Name: Administrator
>> Primary Domain: GONAPASMG01
>> Primary Logon ID: (0x0,0x2F40576F)
>> Client User Name: -
>> Client Domain: -
>> Client Logon ID: -
>> Accesses: READ_CONTROL
>> SYNCHRONIZE
>> ReadData (or ListDirectory)
>> WriteData (or AddFile)
>> AppendData (or AddSubdirectory or CreatePipeInstance)
>> ReadEA
>> WriteEA
>> ReadAttributes
>> WriteAttributes
>>
>> Privileges: -
>> Restricted Sid Count: 0
>> Access Mask: 0x12019F
>>
>> Basically I want to create a rule with event id 560 and add some of
>> the accesses to the rule, but it seems like my log collector is not
>> collecting those logs properly. Is it possible to capture those
>> information?
>>
>> thanks
>
