Daniel Cid wrote:
> Hi Dennis,
> 
> Rootcheck shouldn't be checking read-only file systems in there
> (including /proc, /sys, etc). I made a small fix
> for it and it is available at:
> 
> http://www.ossec.net/files/snapshots/ossec-hids-090304.tar.gz
> 
> If you can try it out, it would be great.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> --
> Daniel B. Cid

Thanks Daniel,

I installed the snapshot and tested. I had to let it run for a while to
make sure it looked okay.

Looks good,

Dennis

> 
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Dennis Golden
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Bruce Martins wrote:
>>> Yeah I don't seen an option in the documentation for adding an ignore
>>> value to root check, did you add the value scanall and set this to
>>> yes ?
>> No.
>>
>>> If so I would try setting this to no or removing it as the default
>>> value is no.
>> Well, I created a local rule to ignore these:
>>
>> <group name="ossec,">
>>
>>  <rule id="100511" level="0">
>>    <if_sid>510</if_sid>
>>    <match>/var/lib/ntp/proc</match>
>>    <description>Read only proc filesystem.</description>
>>    <group>rootcheck,</group>
>>  </rule>
>>
>> </group> <!-- OSSEC -->
>>
>> But this seems a waste of processing, so I created a bug report on
>> bugzilla. Hopefully, this local rule will help someone else, who happens
>> on the problem.
>>
>> Dennis
>> --
>> Dennis Golden
>> Golden Consulting Services, Inc.
>>
> 


-- 
Dennis Golden
Golden Consulting Services, Inc.

Reply via email to