Hi Matthias,

Can you try the following snapshot?

http://www.ossec.net/files/snapshots/ossec-hids-090326.tar.gz

I believe we fixed this issue in there.


Thanks,

--
Daniel B. Cid
dcid ( at ) ossec.net


On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 5:22 PM, matthias platzer <[email protected]> 
wrote:
>
> Michael,
>
> Indeed, I am running ossec on Centos 5.2 x86_64, so maybe this is
> platform(architecture) specific. I may remember having read something
> about a segfault on x86_64 on the list... but can't find the post
> right now.
>
> I found the answer about my question regarding syscheck_update, that
> tool empties the syscheck database and ossec should be stopped before
> running it. (or restarted afterwards) The right tool here would be
> agent_control. (running syscheck immediatly)
>
> regards,
> matthias
>
> On Mar 25, 2:47 pm, Michael Caplan <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> Matthias,
>>
>> I'm wondering if this is a platform specific issue.  By any chance, are
>> you running on 64bit linux?  I'm running 64bit CentOS 5.2.  I don't have
>> this issue on a 32bit install of CentOS 5.2.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 08:12 -0400, ddp wrote:
>> > Try "-u local"
>> > -u local Update syscheck database locally.
>>
>> > I'm not getting a segfault for local or remote clients. Not even
>> > clients that aren't connected.
>>
>> > dan
>>
>> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 7:09 PM, matthias platzer <[email protected]> 
>> > wrote:
>>
>> > > hi,
>>
>> > > I just upgraded to 2.0...
>> > > same here, seg fault with local and agent id
>> > > ./syscheck_control -i 006
>>
>> > > Integrity changes for agent 'wsus (006) - x.x.x.x':
>> > > Segmentation fault
>>
>> > > immediately after issuing
>> > > ./syscheck_update -u 006
>> > > the seg fault is gone for the agent 006.
>>
>> > > But ./syscheck_update -u 000
>>
>> > > ** Invalid agent id '000'
>>
>> > > How could I update for the local server 000 ?
>>
>> > > Anyway, from ./syscheck_control -h
>> > > "-u <id>     Updates (clear)  the database for the agent."
>>
>> > > Does this mean, clear the database and build a new one or just update
>> > > it by running syscheck. And what for is syscheck_update then?
>> > > And what would be the proper way to run syscheck on an agent (from the
>> > > server) ?
>>
>> > > BTW, I might have found a bug:
>> > > On a Windows 2000 Server, agent-2.0, setting syscheck.sleep_after=150
>> > > in internal_options.conf prevents the agent from startup.
>>
>> > > tia+regards,
>> > > matthias
>>
>> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>>
>> E-mail messages may contain viruses, worms, or other malicious code. By 
>> reading the message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full 
>> responsibility for taking protective action against such code. Henry Schein 
>> is not liable for any loss or damage arising from this message.
>>
>> The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
>> It is intended solely for the addressee(s). Access to this e-mail by anyone 
>> else is unauthorized.
>

Reply via email to