Thank you for this work and for sharing with the list/community. 

I would like to add your testing results and methods into ossec.net/doc/ (beta 
docs for up and coming release). If you give permission could you also send me 
any scripts/tools and method details to the list also to be included?

Thank you again,
Jeremy Rossi


Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 23, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Christopher Moraes <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Everyone, 
> 
> Here are the results from Day 2 of my Performance test - 
> 
> 1.  Generated 11,000 EPS in the log files being monitored.  
> 2.  OSSEC scaled beautifully to process at exactly the same rate - 11,000 
> EPS.  
> 3.  CPU utilization increased to 50% (avg) for analysisd and 20% (avg) for 
> log-collector
> 4.  Memory utilization is steady at 1-2%
> 
> Test Setup - 
> -  The hardware (VM) remains same as mentioned below.
> -  Load is generated across 4 log files - messages (linux syslog), maillog, 
> apache access log and apache error log
> -  Alert severity is set to 1
> -  While testing with 11,000 EPS the log files were approx 6-8 GB in size.  I 
> have not seen any degradation in performance with increase in the size of the 
> log file being monitored.
> -  CPU utilization is reported as % of total CPU time (in this case % of 
> combined 2 core CPU setup)
> 
> I will tabulate the results from all the test runs and will share with the 
> group.
> 
> Dan, I will try to test client/server mode either tomorrow or Mon.
> 
>  
> > Here are some results of another performance test round -
> > 1.  Generated 6000 EPS in the log files
> > 2.  OSSEC processed at the same rate i.e. 6000 EPS
> > 3.  CPU utilization increased to 30% (avg) for analysisd and 10% (avg) for
> > log-collector
> > 4.  Memory utilization is steady at 1%
> > Test Server:
> > RHEL VM setup with dual CPU and 4 GB RAM.
> > OSSEC has been installed in "Local" mode
> > OSSEC seems to be vertically scaling quite well - with an increase in load
> > it is consuming more server resources.
> > I am now testing with around 10,000 EPS and will publish the results.
> 

Reply via email to