I also tried with <location>all</location> and it did not work.


Something I did notice: on the OSSEC server the "/var/ossec/queue/
alerts/ar" file exists while on the agents I'm trying to get this to
work on, that file does not exist. Is this the cause of the problem?
If so, what would have caused the ar file to go away? And how can I
get it back?

On Feb 4, 3:02 pm, jplee3 <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I'm not exactly sure what happened but it seems my Active Response
> stopped working. I've verified the rule behind the AR gets triggered
> and I also manually tested the rule via the agent_control command.
>
> Here's the configs/logs:
>
> ossec.conf:
>   <command>
>     <name>route-null</name>
>     <executable>route-null.sh</executable>
>     <expect>srcip</expect>
>     <timeout_allowed>yes</timeout_allowed>
>   </command>
>
>   <active-response>
>     <command>route-null</command>
>     <location>defined-agent</location>
>     <agent_id>108</agent_id>
>     <rules_id>300042</rules_id>
>     <timeout>1800</timeout>
>   </active-response>
>
>   <active-response>
>     <command>route-null</command>
>     <location>defined-agent</location>
>     <agent_id>109</agent_id>
>     <rules_id>300042</rules_id>
>     <timeout>1800</timeout>
>   </active-response>
>
> alert.log (sanitized):
> ** Alert 1296859856.1087142244: mail  - local,syslog,
> 2011 Feb 04 14:50:56 lxapp5->/nas/logs/attack/attack.log
> Rule: 300042 (level 8) -> 'Multiple scripted attack'
> Src IP: 192.168.1.45
> User: user2
> [blah blah blah blah blah 192.168.45 blah blah blah user2]
>
> So the alert is definitely being triggered here...
>
> To test that AR is functional:
> server:
> /var/ossec/bin/agent_control -u 109 -b 1.2.3.4 -f route-null1800
>
> OSSEC HIDS agent_control: Running active response 'route-null1800' on:
> 109
>
> agent (active-responses.log):
> Fri Feb  4 14:58:29 PST 2011 /var/ossec/active-response/bin/route-
> null.sh add - 1.2.3.4 (from_the_server) (no_rule_id)
>
> So for some reason it seems OSSEC is not paying attention to the
> portion of the conf regarding active responses... it might just be a
> dumb typo but is there anyway to debug further to find the root cause?
> Or does anyone see anything wrong with the snippet of the conf? I also
> tried removing "<disabled>no</disabled" to no avail. I have made no
> changes to the route-null.sh AR script either. This was all working
> previously and I had to stop it due to issues back in January. I just
> got back to playing around with this again and it's not working.
>
> Any ideas?

Reply via email to