Hi Joshua,

Depending on the VPN link and the type / amount of the logs, it might
be better to install the manager (or standalone)
option on each location (option #2) and only send the alerts to the
centralized manager.

I do it often when monitoring httpd (or proxy) logs that can generate
thousands or more logs per second that don't
need to be sent to the central location...

But the option #1 is certainly the easiest to setup and get started
(note that OSSEC will detect if the manager or link is down and you
will not lose a lot of logs).

Thanks,

--
Daniel B. Cid
dcid ( at ) ossec.net

On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Josh Brower <[email protected]> wrote:
> I am looking at setting up OSSEC on my critical servers, which will then
> dump into OSSIM.  This will be setup at 5 locations, with each location
> being interconnected via a VPN.
>
>
>
> My question is more of a “what is the best way to do this?” question.
>
>
>
> I am thinking of a couple different scenarios—Any comments would be
> appreciated:
>
>
>
> 1)      OSSEC Manager at the main site.  Each location’s agents will ship
> their logs across the VPN.  OSSIM Agent installed on OSSEC Manager server,
> to gather all the OSSEC logs.
>
>
>
> 2)      OSSEC Manager at each location, all shipping their logs to the
> primary OSSEC Manager at the main site. OSSIM Agent installed on the primary
> OSSEC manager server, to gather all the OSSEC logs.
>
>
>
>
>
> 3)      OSSEC agents ship their logs to the OSSIM sensor that is located at
> each site.  The OSSIM sensor at each site ships their logs across the vpn to
> the main site’s OSSIM server/database.
>
>
>
> -My main concerns are as follows:
>
>                 -I Don’t want to lose logs if the VPN goes down for a couple
> hours.
>
>                 -I am not convinced that I want to use the OSSEC server that
> comes pre-installed on OSSIM—I would rather the integration not be that
> tight, as it will be easier to upgrade and troubleshoot when crap happens.
>
>
>
> Thoughts or comments?
>
>
>
> --
>
> Joshua Brower
>
> [email protected]
>
> DefensiveDepth.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to