That seems a bit drastic, especially considering the fact I'm willing to update the documentation if it's lacking. But you're currently using OSSEC as provided by Atomic. You seem to be having issues with the Atomic provided parts, why not ask them for help?
Or provide me with the parts that aren't documented properly so I can work on correcting that issue? I'm currently working on 2 FAQ entries that the mailing list has inspired. I don't mind working on something else as well. On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Steven Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Ah Ok...I think I get the msg.....I'll rip OSSEC out this isnt a > workable....... > > regards > > Steven Jones > > Technical Specialist - Linux RHCE > > Victoria University, Wellington, NZ > > 0064 4 463 6272 > > ________________________________________ > From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of > dan (ddp) [[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, 18 November 2011 10:20 a.m. > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ossec-list] rpm setup > > Those are provided by the atomic people, not OSSEC. Perhaps you should > contact the atomic guys about the problem then? > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Steven Jones <[email protected]> wrote: >> http://www.ossec.net/main/downloads >> >> from the atomic repository. >> >> >> 8><---------- >> >> ============ >> >> We don't currently provide RPMs. Where did you get the RPM? >> >> ============ >> >> 8><---------- >
