One more (maybe crucial) information.

My installation (and also system) drive is E, hence the agent is
installed under:
E:\Program Files\ossec-agent\


On Dec 22, 9:45 pm, Peter Skurczak <[email protected]> wrote:
> On the agent, in ossec.conf I've got the following section:
>
> (...)
> <active-response>
> <disabled>no</disabled>
> </active-response>
>
> </ossec_config>
>
> I actually followed the manual 
> onhttp://www.ossec.net/main/manual/manual-active-response-on-windows
>
> I will turn on windows debug and let you know what it says when I execute
> "remote ip ban"
> # Windows debug (used by the windows agent)
> windows.debug=2
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 9:00 PM, dan (ddp) <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Is AR enabled on the agent?
>
> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Peter Skurczak
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Hello everyone,
>
> > > Although I read a lot on the internet about it, still I can't get why do
> > I
> > > have these kind of errors on the agent side (below).
> > > Every time I'm trying to fire up: /var/ossec/bin/agent_control -b
> > 1.2.3.5 -f
> > > win_nullroute -u 002 I get:
>
> > > 2011/12/22 20:22:09 ossec-execd(1311): ERROR: Invalid command name
> > > 'win_nullroute' provided.
> > > 2011/12/22 20:22:16 ossec-execd(1311): ERROR: Invalid command name
> > > 'win_nullroute' provided.
> > > 2011/12/22 20:22:23 ossec-execd(1311): ERROR: Invalid command name
> > > 'win_nullroute' provided.
>
> > > on the master server in ossec.conf I've got:
>
> > > <name>win_nullroute</name>
> > > <executable>win_nullroute.cmd</executable>
> > > <expect>srcip</expect>
> > > <timeout_allowed>yes</timeout_allowed>
> > > </command>
>
> > > on the agent side I also have got "win_nulroute.cmd" file ready to
> > fire-up.
>
> > > I have also checked ar.conf on both sides the agent and the master - they
> > > are identically the same. At the beginning I was thinking that maybe the
> > > agent does not have the latest version from the master but this is not
> > the
> > > case. I am trying everything but nothing helps.... anyone any idea?
>
> > > Pete

Reply via email to