A nice feature request would be by setting that to zero limiting is completely 
suppressed. Would that be possible ?

-- 
Thanks, Phil

----- Original Message -----
> Thanks Dan that is perfect :)
> --
> Thanks, Phil
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Phil Daws <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > We have that already set ... am wondering if the option is not
> > > exposed and it is a true internal throttling restriction.  The
> > > problem is when you have something like this in your ossec.conf:
> > >
> > 
> > Sorry, crystal ball's on the fritz.
> > 
> > >  <global>
> > >    <email_notification>yes</email_notification>
> > >    <email_to>[email protected]</email_to>
> > >    <smtp_server>email.somedomain.com</smtp_server>
> > >    <email_from>[email protected]</email_from>
> > >  </global>
> > >
> > >  <email_alerts>
> > >    <email_to>[email protected]</email_to>
> > >    <rule_id>10201, 10202, 10203, 10204</rule_id>
> > >    <event_location>[email protected]</event_location>
> > >    <do_not_delay/>
> > >    <do_not_group/>
> > >  </email_alerts>
> > >
> > > can end up that the customer receives alerts for systems that
> > > they
> > > should not see :(
> > > --
> > > Thanks, Phil
> > >
> > 
> > Does this happen at the beginning of the hour? If so, you're
> > possibly
> > hitting the max emails per hour limit. Raise that up, see if it
> > helps.
> > 
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > >> http://www.ossec.net/doc/syntax/head_internal_options.analysisd.html#intopt-maild.groupping
> > >>
> > >> Maybe?
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Phil Daws <[email protected]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > Hello,
> > >> >
> > >> > when there is a flood of alerts I believe OSSEC throttles them
> > >> > to a
> > >> > 15
> > >> > minute window and then sends out emails.  Is there a way to
> > >> > disable
> > >> > this
> > >> > feature as I have noticed that sometimes alerts are going to
> > >> > people
> > >> > that
> > >> > should not be receiving them!
> > >> > --
> > >> > Thanks, Phil
> > >> >
> > >>
> > 
> 

Reply via email to