On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Diezou <[email protected]> wrote: > Because MD5 and SHA-1 is deprecated. > Required due to security policy requirement even if integrity check with > both MD5 and SHA-1 for same file is very secure. >
So it's pretty much a checkmark. Yay auditors. > On Tuesday, August 7, 2012 6:43:34 PM UTC+2, dan (ddpbsd) wrote: >> >> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Wei Zhang <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Is there a place for feature request? +1 for SHA-256 or SHA512 >> > >> >> https://bitbucket.org/dcid/ossec-hids In the issues section >> >> Is there a specific reason you want one of these? Are these required >> by something specific? >> >> > >> > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:13 PM, dan (ddp) <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Diezou <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Hello, >> >> > Can OSSEC 2.6 support SHA-256 or SHA-512 algorithms? >> >> > If not (that I think after docs reading), I'd like to know if these >> >> > algorithms act as a part of future roadmap? >> >> > Thanks >> >> >> >> No, and not really. >> > >> >
