2012/9/24 dan (ddp) <[email protected]>

> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Michiel van Es <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > 2012/9/24 dan (ddp) <[email protected]>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Michiel van Es <[email protected]
> >
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2012/9/24 dan (ddp) <[email protected]>
> >> >
> >> >> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 2:41 AM, Michiel van Es
> >> >> <[email protected]>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> > Hello,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > We are using OSSEC for a PoC and we want to show only some alerts
> >> >> > initially
> >> >> > and expand the alert list.
> >> >> > We are using OSSEC 2.6 mixed Windows and Linux agents.
> >> >> > 1 Manager and several agents and Splunk on the manager server to
> show
> >> >> > the
> >> >> > alerts.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > For now we want to achieve to show only failed and successful
> logins
> >> >> > and
> >> >> > file integrity alerts.
> >> >> > How can we achieve this? => manually going through all rules/xml
> >> >> > files
> >> >> > and
> >> >> > set accordingly all xml entries to 0 or anything else? (0 meaning
> >> >> > disabled
> >> >> > and dont show) or is there an easier way of achieving this?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Kind regards,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Michiel
> >> >>
> >> >> >>You can remove entire rules files if you don't want to use them.
> Just
> >> >> >>test your changes (/var/ossec/bin/ossec-logtest -t) after you do
> this
> >> >> >>to make sure you didn't get rid of something necessary.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Would you suggest creating specific rules in xml files with the
> correct
> >> > alerts and move/disable all others and start from there?
> >>
> >> >>You should do it however you think is best. I don't like this approach
> >> >>and don't have an opinion on it.
> >>
> > What would you suggest?
> >
>
> >>I think you should do what works for you. If starting small and adding
> >>more later is better for your organization, do it. If I was going to
> >>do it that way I'd probably remove the entries for the rule files in
> >>/var/ossec/etc/ossec.conf.
>

Clear.
Thx will work something out!

Michiel

Reply via email to