On Dec 18, 2012 1:13 PM, "Carrie Poole" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
> Turned out to be permissions on queue folder that caused the
> disconnection issues. Still looking into the segfaults when restarting
> agents.
>
> ~ Carrie
>

Which daemon is segfaulting on the agents?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of dan (ddp)
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 10:42 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [ossec-list] segmentation fault
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Carrie Poole
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The segfaults in /var/log/messages are:
> > Dec 17 15:45:24 abeossecpr kernel: ossec-remoted[6378]: segfault at
> > 00000000000002d1 rip 000000000042191b rsp 00007fff87247e90 error 4 Dec
>
> > 17 15:48:56 abeossecpr kernel: ossec-remoted[6627]: segfault at
> > 00000000000002d1 rip 000000000042191b rsp 00007fff76959dc0 error 4
> >
> > ~ Carrie
> >
>
> Ok, I was thinking the segfaults were on the agents. Please post the
> remote section of the ossec.conf.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> > On Behalf Of dan (ddp)
> > Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 10:06 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [ossec-list] segmentation fault
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Carrie Poole
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Line 138 in ossec.conf is the active response, which is disabled:
> >>
> >>         <!-- Active Response Config -->
> >>
> >>         <active-response>
> >>
> >>                 <disabled>yes</disabled>
> >>
> >>                 <!-- This response is going to execute the host-deny
> >>
> >>                  - command for every event that fires a rule with
> >>
> >>                  - level (severity) >= 6.
> >>
> >>                  - The IP is going to be blocked for  600 seconds.
> >>
> >>                  -->
> >>
> >>                 <command>host-deny</command>
> >>
> >>                 <location>local</location>
> >>
> >>                 <level>6</level>
> >>
> >>                 <timeout>600</timeout>
> >>
> >>         </active-response>
> >>
> >>         <active-response>
> >>
> >>                 <disabled>yes</disabled>
> >>
> >>                 <!-- Firewall Drop response. Block the IP for
> >>
> >>                  - 600 seconds on the firewall (iptables,
> >>
> >>                  - ipfilter, etc).
> >>
> >>                  -->
> >>
> >>                 <command>firewall-drop</command>
> >>
> >>                 <location>local</location>
> >>
> >>                 <level>6</level>
> >>
> >>                 <timeout>600</timeout>
> >>
> >>         </active-response>
> >>
> >
> > So it looks like line 138 in ossec-control should be something like:
> >  for i in ${SDAEMONS}; do
> >
> > which goes through the list of daemons and tries to start them. One of
>
> > them is failing, and you have to figure out which one.
> >
> >> All of the ossec logs on the agent say they can't reach the server,
> >> but this wasn't the case last week. The ossec server log doesn't say
> >> anything, it acts as if the agents aren't even there. It does
> >> syscheck
> >
> >> but no longer sees the agents.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Check the system logs, Linux usually logs segfaults. You could also
> > see which daemons are running after the segfault. If no traffic is
> > passing between the agents and the server, ossec-agentd may have
> > crashed. But real troubleshooting can't really happen until the basics
>
> > are taken care of, namely finding out which daemon is crashing.
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ~ Carrie
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> From: [email protected]
> >> [mailto:[email protected]]
> >
> >> On Behalf Of dan (ddp)
> >> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 4:41 PM
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: [ossec-list] segmentation fault
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Dec 17, 2012 4:37 PM, "Carrie Poole"
> >> <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I'm getting segmentation faults across all of my agents when
> > restarting.
> >>> Nothing is showing connected anymore.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> /var/ossec/bin/ossec-control: line 138: 24910 Segmentation fault
> >>> ${DIR}/bin/${i}
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> What's line 138 in ossec-control?
> >> Anything in the ossec.log for the failing agent?
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Line 138 in ossec.conf is the active response, which is disabled.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I have checked the ossec.conf and agent.conf for any mistakes and
> >>> haven't found any. This was an issue on only a few agents last week,
>
> >>> and now it is happening across all agents after the 2,6 upgrade. All
>
> >>> agents are showing not connected. None of the configuration files
> > have changed.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Any help would be appreciated!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Ossec V 2.6   RedHat Linux (server and agents with 5 windows agents)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Carrie P
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail is confidential and intended
> >>> solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
> > addressed.
> >>> If
> >>> you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have
> >>> received
> >
> >>> this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding,
> >>> printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you
> >>> received this e-mail in error, please delete it from your computer
> >>> and contact the sender.
> >>
> >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail is confidential and intended
> >> solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
> >> addressed.  If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that
> >> you
> >
> >> have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination,
> >> forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly
> prohibited.
> >
> >> If you received this e-mail in error, please delete it from your
> >> computer and contact the sender.
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail is confidential and intended
> > solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
> > addressed.  If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you
>
> > have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination,
> > forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.
>
> > If you received this e-mail in error, please delete it from your
> computer and contact the sender.
> >
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail is confidential and intended
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed.
 If
> you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received
> this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing
> or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you received this
e-mail
> in error, please delete it from your computer and contact the sender.
>

Reply via email to