On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 4:19 PM, René Kåbis <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thank you. I was just thinking of a VM, but this is a dual-core with
> (currently) limited resources (~4Gb RAM). Theoretically, I could upgrade it
> to a pair of quad (or maybe even hex-cores) and 48Gb of memory, but this is
> currently *wayyyyy* out of my budget. I can barely justify keeping this unit
> in the colo at the current time (it’s not like it’s bringing in a profit or
> anything, it’s purely for personal projects).
>
> So, assume for a moment I am running something simple, like VirtualBox. Do I
> have to keep the VM up and running at all times, or can I put in a
> thoroughly minimalistic copy of Linux and run the VM purely for creating the
> Authentication Key and then shut it down? Keep in mind, my resources are at
> an absolute minimum. I have only two cores in the machine (a single Opteron
> 2216) and 4GB of ECC REG DDR2. If this VM has to be up and running all the
> time, it’ll bring my server to its knees (memory utilization is typically
> ~3GB, but has spiked up to ~4.5/5GB at times).
>

Agents do no analysis on their own. They pass log messages/file
information to the server, and the server does the analysis.

>
> On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 12:29:34 PM UTC-7, Dustin Lenz wrote:
>>
>> You could run OSSEC in a VM on the same server.
>>
>> On Mar 20, 2013, at 12:19 PM, "René Kåbis" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Actually, I have a very distinct need for an OSSEC server on Windows. I
>> run my own Iron, but all I have right now is a single Windows 2008 R2 server
>> in a colo facility. I do NOT have the cash to put a second machine in that
>> facility. Now, how the bloody hell am I supposed to run OSSEC on my Win2K3R2
>> machine without an OSSEC server??? How do I obtain an "authentication key"
>> without ever adding a second machine to that colo facility???
>>
>> I don't care about keeping both versions in sync. Some places are a
>> windows-only shop, or have needs like mine (no ability to add a Linux server
>> of any kind). Windows is that other major market share out there, and you
>> cannot ASSume that everyone will have the wherewithal to add a Linux server
>> just to run a client app on a single Windows server.
>>
>> I would like to secure my server. I just cannot afford a second server
>> just to do the authentication key part of it.
>>
>> Oh, well. The hope of having an effective and useful intrusion detection
>> system for my Windows server was fun while it lasted.
>>
>> On Friday, February 1, 2013 6:19:17 AM UTC-8, dan (ddpbsd) wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 9:12 AM, mike <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > why do you say 'thankfully' no.
>>> >
>>>
>>> Because supporting that would be a hell I wouldn't wish upon my worst
>>> enemies. Because keeping the Windows version and the main version in
>>> sync would be a nightmare. Because Windows probably isn't the best
>>> platform for an OSSEC server.
>>>
>>> > On Friday, February 1, 2013 11:58:26 AM UTC, dan (ddpbsd) wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Feb 1, 2013 6:58 AM, "mike" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Is there a Windows version of the OSSEC manager nowadays?
>>> >> >
>>> >> > --
>>> >>
>>> >> Thankfully no.
>>> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >> > ---
>>> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> >> > Groups "ossec-list" group.
>>> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>> >> > send
>>> >> > an email to [email protected].
>>> >>
>>> >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> >
>>> > ---
>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> > Groups
>>> > "ossec-list" group.
>>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> > an
>>> > email to [email protected].
>>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>> >
>>> >
>>
>> --
>>
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "ossec-list" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>>
>
> --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "ossec-list" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ossec-list" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to