On Mar 20, 2014 8:09 PM, "Alberto Mijares" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Vic Hargrave <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is the community in full agreement over dropping the rules from the > > ossec-hids package? I for one don't think it is a good idea and would > > create work to rip them out. Why not start out simple and add complexity > > gradually? I'm also more in favor of having a base set of rules so that > > OSSEC does something right out of the box. > > > > > Hi, I'm new in the group. Don't know if it is intended for users or > developers only. Anyway, if my word counts, I think the basic rules
All opinions are appreciated. :) > must stay in the package, so it can work out-of-the-box, like Vic > said. > > A rules repo is a great idea. It just must be seen like an add-on, not > a requirement. > > I think having to go to multiple locations to get a decent ruleset is not good. I think the rules should be in 1 place. It's easier. > Alberto Mijares > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ossec-list" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ossec-list" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
