I used to get this on 2.6 and still get them on 2.7.1
Presumably the snapshots in 2010 didn't have a full fix.
Would like to know the implications of this - is it really a bug that can 
be ignored or is there something else going on under the surface ?
Speaking as an admin of PCI-compliant systems who has twitchy bosses about 
things like this.

On Thursday, 13 March 2014 15:41:43 UTC, Joshua Garnett wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I'm getting this alert also in 2.7.1.  I tried writing a rule to filter 
> them, but it caused remoted to not want to work properly.  I'd welcome a 
> hack at this point, if not a proper fix.
>
> --Josh
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Bib Kam <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm using OSSEC 2.7 but i get still this alert!!
>> Please, how to resolve this issue ?
>>
>> Thank you in advance
>>
>> On Friday, December 3, 2010 1:21:23 AM UTC+1, Daniel Cid wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, a bug on OSSEC. These messages are randomly generated and should 
>>> not reach
>>> analysisd.
>>>
>>> Been fixed on the latest snapshot: http:/www.ossec.net/files/snapshots/
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:32 PM, dan (ddp) <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:52 PM, loyd.darby <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >> That leaves only a memory / buffer overflow kind of error .  If it 
>>> only
>>> >> happened once I would not sweat it.
>>> >> It is also "possible" that the log data got corrupted in transit 
>>> (look at
>>> >> netstat -s for host and client interfaces)
>>> >> If it repeats, then I would relook at the logs, possibly with a 
>>> different
>>> >> tool.
>>> >> Binary data in a log file can hide from editors so cat, grep and 
>>> strings are
>>> >> better tools.
>>> >> I think it is unlikely that OSSEC bug can cause this but you could
>>> >> re-install as a last resort.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > Or it could be part of the keep alive messages in OSSEC:
>>> > (from src/logcollector/logcollector.c)
>>> > char *rand_keepalive_str(char *dst, int size)
>>> > {
>>> >    static const char text[] = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz"
>>> >                               "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ"
>>> >                               "0123456789"
>>> >                               "!@#$%^&*()_+-=;'[],./?";
>>> >    int i, len = rand() % (size - 10);
>>> >    strncpy(dst, "--MARK--: ", 12);
>>> >    for ( i = 10; i < len; ++i )
>>> >    {
>>> >        dst[i] = text[rand() % (sizeof text - 1)];
>>> >    }
>>> >    dst[i] = '\0';
>>> >    return dst;
>>> > }
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >> On 12/02/2010 04:06 PM, Andre Pawlowski wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I don't find this log entry in any of my logs. That means that there 
>>> was
>>> >>> no syslog message with this text. Smart didn't detect anything 
>>> strange
>>> >>> either.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Andre Pawlowski
>>> >>>
>>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Poor is the pupil who does not surpass his master.
>>> >>>        -Leonardo da Vinci
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On 12/02/2010 07:54 PM, loyd.darby wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> It means that a syslog message had one of these words in it:
>>> >>>> core_dumped|failure|error|attack|bad |illegal
>>> >>>> |denied|refused|unauthorized|fatal|failed|Segmentation 
>>> Fault|Corrupted
>>> >>>> MARK and the string of characters is actually part of the message 
>>> and it
>>> >>>> is likely a disk error.
>>> >>>> It definitely should be looked at.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On 12/02/2010 12:10 PM, dan (ddp) wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Andre Pawlowski<[email protected]>
>>> >>>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Hi list,
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> I've got a strange error message from my ossec server that I don't
>>> >>>>>> understand:
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> OSSEC HIDS Notification.
>>> >>>>>> 2010 Dec 02 09:48:40
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Received From: kokyt0s->ossec-keepalive
>>> >>>>>> Rule: 1002 fired (level 2) ->   "Unknown problem somewhere in the
>>> >>>>>> system."
>>> >>>>>> Portion of the log(s):
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> --MARK--:
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> &pQSW__BPa5S?%tyDTJ3-iCG2lz2dU))r(F%6tjp8wqpf=]
>>> IKFT%ND2kP]ua/W)3-6'eHduX$;$Axqq7Vr.dVZ1SUDSaH)
>>> 4xTXCIieaEKv47LD-bU)SXMnXO/jPGKn3.!NGBR_5]jD2UoSV9)h%z8G%
>>> 7.xhI;s)267.rV214O@t2#w)Z(k'UQp9]MyDERrOrG[-,e?iS@B3Rg/
>>> kGiR[g6mc0K)/]S]0'+?+'/.[r$fqBR^7iAjoPv4j6SWjeRsLGr%$3#p+
>>> buf&u_RC3i/mE3vS3*jp&B1qSJM431TmEg,YJ][ge;6-dJI69?-
>>> TB?!BI4?Uza63V3vMY3ake6ahj-%A-m_5lgab!OVR,!pR+;L]eLgilU
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>   --END OF NOTIFICATION
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Has anyone an idea what this means?
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Regards
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> --
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Andre Pawlowski
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> -------
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Wenn eine Idee nicht zuerst absurd erscheint, taugt sie nichts.
>>> >>>>>>         -Albert Einstein
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> I think it's "normal" (although I didn't think these messages were
>>> >>>>> going to be logged). It's definitely nothing to worry about. I 
>>> think
>>> >>>>> the random text in the message is just padding to make the keep 
>>> alives
>>> >>>>> indistinguishable from other messages based on packet size.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> R. Loyd Darby, OSSIM-OCSE
>>> >> Project Manager DOC/NOAA/NMFS
>>> >> Infrastructure coordinator
>>> >> Southeast Fisheries Science Center
>>> >> 305-361-4297
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>>  -- 
>>
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "ossec-list" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ossec-list" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to