I'm going to post this here as well as the github issue. I might have
a fix for this in my diff_overwrite branch
(https://github.com/ddpbsd/ossec-hids/tree/diff_overwrite). Please
test and report findings. It seems to be working for me, but changes
to the way rules are handled in analysisd can have a much bigger
impact than intended, so the more testing we can get (of all analysisd
things) the better off we'll be.

On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 9:16 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ok, Thanks for the advice.
>
> On Tuesday, December 16, 2014 7:54:01 AM UTC-6, dan (ddpbsd) wrote:
>>
>> I've been playing with it for a while and can't figure it out. You
>> should probably post an issue to github
>> (https://github.com/ossec/ossec-hids). The devs may pay attention to
>> it there.
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 2:12 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > I decided to give gdb a try again. I can get it to segfault pretty
>> > consistently. Here is my output.
>> >
>> > [root@ossectst ossec]# ps -ef | grep ossec
>> > root      5018  4903  0 12:39 pts/2    00:00:00 tail -f logs/ossec.log
>> > root      5675  2407  0 12:50 pts/1    00:00:00 grep ossec
>> > [root@ossectst ossec]# service ossec start
>> > Starting OSSEC:                                            [  OK  ]
>> > [root@ossectst ossec]# ps -ef | grep ossec
>> > root      5018  4903  0 12:39 pts/2    00:00:00 tail -f logs/ossec.log
>> > ossecm    5711     1  0 12:50 ?        00:00:00
>> > /var/ossec/bin/ossec-maild
>> > root      5715     1  0 12:50 ?        00:00:00
>> > /var/ossec/bin/ossec-execd
>> > ossec     5719     1  0 12:50 ?        00:00:00
>> > /var/ossec/bin/ossec-analysisd
>> > root      5723     1  0 12:50 ?        00:00:00
>> > /var/ossec/bin/ossec-logcollector
>> > ossecr    5728     1  0 12:50 ?        00:00:00
>> > /var/ossec/bin/ossec-remoted
>> > root      5734     1  0 12:50 ?        00:00:00
>> > /var/ossec/bin/ossec-syscheckd
>> > ossec     5737     1  0 12:50 ?        00:00:00
>> > /var/ossec/bin/ossec-monitord
>> > root      5747  2407  0 12:50 pts/1    00:00:00 grep ossec
>> > [root@ossectst ossec]# gdb /var/ossec/bin/ossec-analysisd 5719
>> > GNU gdb (GDB) Amazon Linux (7.6.1-51.24.amzn1)
>> > Copyright (C) 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>> > License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later
>> > <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
>> > This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
>> > There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.  Type "show
>> > copying"
>> > and "show warranty" for details.
>> > This GDB was configured as "x86_64-amazon-linux-gnu".
>> > For bug reporting instructions, please see:
>> > <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>...
>> > Reading symbols from /var/ossec/bin/ossec-analysisd...done.
>> > Attaching to program: /var/ossec/bin/ossec-analysisd, process 5719
>> > Reading symbols from /lib64/libm.so.6...Reading symbols from
>> > /usr/lib/debug/lib64/libm-2.17.so.debug...done.
>> > done.
>> > Loaded symbols for /lib64/libm.so.6
>> > Reading symbols from /lib64/libc.so.6...Reading symbols from
>> > /usr/lib/debug/lib64/libc-2.17.so.debug...done.
>> > done.
>> > Loaded symbols for /lib64/libc.so.6
>> > Reading symbols from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2...Reading symbols from
>> > /usr/lib/debug/lib64/ld-2.17.so.debug...done.
>> > done.
>> > Loaded symbols for /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
>> > Reading symbols from /lib64/libnss_files.so.2...Reading symbols from
>> > /usr/lib/debug/lib64/libnss_files-2.17.so.debug...done.
>> > done.
>> > Loaded symbols for /lib64/libnss_files.so.2
>> > 0x00007f9f2b003b53 in __recvfrom_nocancel () at
>> > ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:81
>> > 81 T_PSEUDO (SYSCALL_SYMBOL, SYSCALL_NAME, SYSCALL_NARGS)
>> > (gdb) bt
>> > #0  0x00007f9f2b003b53 in __recvfrom_nocancel () at
>> > ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:81
>> > #1  0x0000000000430569 in OS_RecvUnix (socket=4, sizet=6144,
>> > ret=0x7fffe0f85870 "1:/var/log/maillog") at os_net.c:539
>> > #2  0x0000000000403612 in OS_ReadMSG (m_queue=4) at analysisd.c:754
>> > #3  0x0000000000403262 in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffe0f87268) at
>> > analysisd.c:555
>> > (gdb) cont
>> > Continuing.
>> >
>> > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>> > 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
>> > (gdb) where
>> > #0  0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
>> > #1  0x0000000000404a0e in OS_CheckIfRuleMatch (lf=0x1b0a490,
>> > curr_node=0x1addcd0) at analysisd.c:1631
>> > #2  0x0000000000404a53 in OS_CheckIfRuleMatch (lf=0x1b0a490,
>> > curr_node=0x1adcac0) at analysisd.c:1654
>> > #3  0x0000000000404a53 in OS_CheckIfRuleMatch (lf=0x1b0a490,
>> > curr_node=0x1ad53f0) at analysisd.c:1654
>> > #4  0x0000000000404a53 in OS_CheckIfRuleMatch (lf=0x1b0a490,
>> > curr_node=0x199c4e0) at analysisd.c:1654
>> > #5  0x0000000000403a5e in OS_ReadMSG (m_queue=4) at analysisd.c:984
>> > #6  0x0000000000403262 in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffe0f87268) at
>> > analysisd.c:555
>> > (gdb) list
>> > 76 #else
>> > 77
>> > 78 /* This is a "normal" system call stub: if there is an error,
>> > 79    it returns -1 and sets errno.  */
>> > 80
>> > 81 T_PSEUDO (SYSCALL_SYMBOL, SYSCALL_NAME, SYSCALL_NARGS)
>> > 82    ret
>> > 83 T_PSEUDO_END (SYSCALL_SYMBOL)
>> > 84
>> > 85 #endif
>> > (gdb) bt full
>> > #0  0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
>> > No symbol table info available.
>> > #1  0x0000000000404a0e in OS_CheckIfRuleMatch (lf=0x1b0a490,
>> > curr_node=0x1addcd0) at analysisd.c:1631
>> >         currently_rule = 0x1add7c0
>> > #2  0x0000000000404a53 in OS_CheckIfRuleMatch (lf=0x1b0a490,
>> > curr_node=0x1adcac0) at analysisd.c:1654
>> >         child_node = 0x1addcd0
>> >         child_rule = 0x0
>> >         currently_rule = 0x1adc770
>> > #3  0x0000000000404a53 in OS_CheckIfRuleMatch (lf=0x1b0a490,
>> > curr_node=0x1ad53f0) at analysisd.c:1654
>> >         child_node = 0x1adcac0
>> >         child_rule = 0x0
>> >         currently_rule = 0x1ad5ff0
>> > #4  0x0000000000404a53 in OS_CheckIfRuleMatch (lf=0x1b0a490,
>> > curr_node=0x199c4e0) at analysisd.c:1654
>> >         child_node = 0x1ad53f0
>> >         child_rule = 0x0
>> >         currently_rule = 0x199c210
>> > #5  0x0000000000403a5e in OS_ReadMSG (m_queue=4) at analysisd.c:984
>> >         rulenode_pt = 0x199c4e0
>> >         i = 765
>> >         msg = "1:(itchy) 10.0.1.0->netstat -tan |grep LISTEN |grep -v
>> > 127.0.0.1 | sort\000ossec: output: 'netstat -tan |grep LISTEN |grep -v
>> > 127.0.0.1 | sort':\ntcp        0      0 0.0.0.0:22", ' ' <repeats 18
>> > times>,
>> > "0.0.0.0:*", ' ' <repeats 19 times>...
>> >         lf = 0x1b0a490
>> > ---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
>> >         stats_rule = 0x1b08b00
>> > #6  0x0000000000403262 in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffe0f87268) at
>> > analysisd.c:555
>> >         c = -2
>> >         m_queue = 4
>> >         test_config = 0
>> >         run_foreground = 0
>> >         debug_level = 0
>> >         dir = 0x444bc0 "/var/ossec"
>> >         user = 0x444bcb "ossec"
>> >         group = 0x444bcb "ossec"
>> >         uid = 503
>> >         gid = 502
>> >         cfg = 0x444bd1 "/var/ossec/etc/ossec.conf"
>> > (gdb) cont
>> > Continuing.
>> >
>> > Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>> > The program no longer exists.
>> > (gdb) quit
>> > [root@ossectst ossec]# service ossec stop
>> > Stopping OSSEC:                                            [  OK  ]
>> > [root@ossectst ossec]# tail /var/log/messages
>> > ... snip ...
>> > Dec 15 10:45:51 ossectst kernel: [ 2082.001287] ossec-analysisd[3772]:
>> > segfault at 0 ip           (null) sp 00007fffa4fa8218 error 14 in
>> > ossec-analysisd[400000+65000]
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Monday, December 15, 2014 8:56:33 AM UTC-6, dan (ddpbsd) wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 8:47 AM, dan (ddp) <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> > On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 5:37 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >> Ok, I can reproduce the segfault with a bare minimum.  Here is what
>> >> >> I
>> >> >> did:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 1) I spun up a brand new server (clone of my current ossec server),
>> >> >> installed a fresh 2.8.1 ossec server. Modified local_rules.xml to
>> >> >> look
>> >> >> like
>> >> >> this:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> <!-- @(#) $Id: ./etc/rules/local_rules.xml, 2011/09/08 dcid Exp $
>> >> >>
>> >> >>   -  Example of local rules for OSSEC.
>> >> >>   -
>> >> >>   -  Copyright (C) 2009 Trend Micro Inc.
>> >> >>   -  All rights reserved.
>> >> >>   -
>> >> >>   -  This program is a free software; you can redistribute it
>> >> >>   -  and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public
>> >> >>   -  License (version 2) as published by the FSF - Free Software
>> >> >>   -  Foundation.
>> >> >>   -
>> >> >>   -  License details: http://www.ossec.net/en/licensing.html
>> >> >>   -->
>> >> >> <!-- Modify it at your will. -->
>> >> >>
>> >> >> <group name="local,syslog,">
>> >> >>   <!-- move from level 7 to level 5 6/25/2013 -->
>> >> >>   <rule id="533" level="5" overwrite="yes">
>> >> >>     <if_sid>530</if_sid>
>> >> >>     <match>ossec: output: 'netstat -tan</match>
>> >> >>     <check_diff />
>> >> >>     <description>Listened ports status (netstat) changed (new port
>> >> >> opened or
>> >> >> closed).</description>
>> >> >>   </rule>
>> >> >> </group> <!-- SYSLOG,LOCAL -->
>> >> >> <!-- EOF -->
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I did NOT add any agents, but let that run for about an hour.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2) I then stopped the ossec server, ran manage_agents, added one
>> >> >> agent
>> >> >> and
>> >> >> restarted the ossec server. NOTE, I did not transfer the agent key,
>> >> >> so
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> agent was not trying to communicate yet. I let that run for about an
>> >> >> hour.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 3) I transferred the key to the agent - this is an existing agent, I
>> >> >> just
>> >> >> added the new key and change the <server-ip> to point to my new test
>> >> >> server
>> >> >> and restarted the agent and server. I begin to see communication
>> >> >> between
>> >> >> server and agent. I let it run it's initial scans - about 10
>> >> >> minutes.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 4) Then I opened a new listen port to try and trigger the netstat
>> >> >> -tan
>> >> >> rule
>> >> >> using nc -l 7777 on the agent.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 5) ossec-analysisd segfaulted after about 7 minues.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Let me know if you want any of the output or if you want me to run
>> >> >> any
>> >> >> other
>> >> >> tests.
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > Wow, thanks. I was able to reproduce it with this info.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Sometimes. It apparently doesn't like crashing when running under gdb.
>> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Friday, December 12, 2014 11:14:47 AM UTC-6, [email protected]
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> I get the segfault with ONLY the posted rule in my local_rules.xml.
>> >> >>> In
>> >> >>> other words, with a completely vanilla install of 2.8.1, by just
>> >> >>> adding that
>> >> >>> rule to local_rules.xml and restarting.  Unfortunately, I can't
>> >> >>> remember if
>> >> >>> I needed to add agents before I got the segfault. I'm happy to spin
>> >> >>> up
>> >> >>> a new
>> >> >>> instance and test it out though.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On Friday, December 12, 2014 10:52:25 AM UTC-6, dan (ddpbsd) wrote:
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 11:33 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >>>> > I'm so sorry. This IS 2.8.1 code. My post says v1.7 and 1.8, but
>> >> >>>> > I
>> >> >>>> > meant v
>> >> >>>> > 2.7 and 2.8.
>> >> >>>> >
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> I'm not able to reproduce this, could you provide your entire
>> >> >>>> local_rules.xml?
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> > On Friday, December 12, 2014 9:59:34 AM UTC-6, dan (ddpbsd)
>> >> >>>> > wrote:
>> >> >>>> >>
>> >> >>>> >> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 10:43 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >>>> >> > I recently migrated our ossec server to new hardware, and at
>> >> >>>> >> > the
>> >> >>>> >> > same
>> >> >>>> >> > time
>> >> >>>> >> > upgraded from v 1.7 to 1.8. Unfortunately ossec-analysisd
>> >> >>>> >> > kept
>> >> >>>> >> > segfaulting
>> >> >>>> >> > in the new environment. It's taken me a couple of weeks to
>> >> >>>> >> > narrow it
>> >> >>>> >> > down,
>> >> >>>> >> > and it seems to be consistently caused by the following rule
>> >> >>>> >> > from my
>> >> >>>> >> > local_rules.xml (downgrade of a base rule from level 7 to
>> >> >>>> >> > level
>> >> >>>> >> > 5):
>> >> >>>> >> >
>> >> >>>> >> >   <rule id="533" level="5" overwrite="yes">
>> >> >>>> >> >     <if_sid>530</if_sid>
>> >> >>>> >> >     <match>ossec: output: 'netstat -tan</match>
>> >> >>>> >> >     <check_diff />
>> >> >>>> >> >     <description>Listened ports status (netstat) changed (new
>> >> >>>> >> > port
>> >> >>>> >> > opened or
>> >> >>>> >> > closed).</description>
>> >> >>>> >> >   </rule>
>> >> >>>> >> >
>> >> >>>> >> > This rule has been running under v1.7 in our old environment
>> >> >>>> >> > for
>> >> >>>> >> > over a
>> >> >>>> >> > year. For now, I've just commented out this rule and all is
>> >> >>>> >> > good,
>> >> >>>> >> > but I
>> >> >>>> >> > thought it might be helpful to the community if we figure out
>> >> >>>> >> > what's
>> >> >>>> >> > going
>> >> >>>> >> > on - is it a bug, or some boneheaded misconfiguration on my
>> >> >>>> >> > part.
>> >> >>>> >> > I'm
>> >> >>>> >> > happy
>> >> >>>> >> > to provide more detail if needed.
>> >> >>>> >> >
>> >> >>>> >> > Current environment is Amazon AWS VPC. All servers are
>> >> >>>> >> > running
>> >> >>>> >> > Amazon
>> >> >>>> >> > Linux
>> >> >>>> >> > 64-bit AMI's (based on RHEL/CentOS).
>> >> >>>> >> > [root@smithers ossec]# uname -a
>> >> >>>> >> > Linux smithers 3.14.23-22.44.amzn1.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Nov 11
>> >> >>>> >> > 23:07:48
>> >> >>>> >> > UTC
>> >> >>>> >> > 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>> >> >>>> >> >
>> >> >>>> >> > Initially I tried to migrate everything that was relevant
>> >> >>>> >> > (client.keys,
>> >> >>>> >> > ossec.conf, local_rules.xml, rids files, etc). But with
>> >> >>>> >> > constant
>> >> >>>> >> > crashes, I
>> >> >>>> >> > backed everything out and used the following basic process to
>> >> >>>> >> > narrow
>> >> >>>> >> > down
>> >> >>>> >> > what was happening:
>> >> >>>> >> >
>> >> >>>> >> > 1) I installed v1.8 server, and ran the default install with
>> >> >>>> >> > no
>> >> >>>> >> > agents
>> >> >>>> >> > for
>> >> >>>> >> > about 24 hours. All good.
>> >> >>>> >> > 2) Added one agent (fresh install, new key, no custom rules),
>> >> >>>> >> > ran
>> >> >>>> >> > for 24
>> >> >>>> >> > hours. All good.
>> >> >>>> >> > 3) Added remaining 7 agents (fresh install, new key, no
>> >> >>>> >> > custom
>> >> >>>> >> > rules),
>> >> >>>> >> > ran
>> >> >>>> >> > for 24 hours. All good.
>> >> >>>> >> > 4) Added my local_rules.xml, analysisd segfaulted within a
>> >> >>>> >> > few
>> >> >>>> >> > minutes.
>> >> >>>> >> > 5) Removed local_rules.xml, ran for 24 hours with no
>> >> >>>> >> > problems.
>> >> >>>> >> > 6) Added local_rules.xml back, analysisd segfaulted after a
>> >> >>>> >> > few
>> >> >>>> >> > minutes.
>> >> >>>> >> > 7) Removed local_rules.xml. Started adding one rule at a
>> >> >>>> >> > time,
>> >> >>>> >> > and
>> >> >>>> >> > running
>> >> >>>> >> > for 6 - 12 hours with each new rule.
>> >> >>>> >> > 8) The above rule seems to consistently be the problem.
>> >> >>>> >> > HOWEVER,
>> >> >>>> >> > since
>> >> >>>> >> > it
>> >> >>>> >> > can take anywhere from a few minutes to a few hours (up to 5)
>> >> >>>> >> > for
>> >> >>>> >> > the
>> >> >>>> >> > segfault to occur, it is possible the above rule is not the
>> >> >>>> >> > problem.
>> >> >>>> >> >
>> >> >>>> >> > I did try running analysisd with gdb to get some more
>> >> >>>> >> > information,
>> >> >>>> >> > but
>> >> >>>> >> > I'm
>> >> >>>> >> > not confident that I got all the ossec processes started
>> >> >>>> >> > correctly
>> >> >>>> >> > when
>> >> >>>> >> > I
>> >> >>>> >> > did it. I can post all the output from that run if someone
>> >> >>>> >> > wants
>> >> >>>> >> > it.
>> >> >>>> >> >
>> >> >>>> >> > Here is an example of the output in /var/log/messages:
>> >> >>>> >> >
>> >> >>>> >> > Dec  9 12:02:03 smithers kernel: [513311.628392]
>> >> >>>> >> > ossec-analysisd[12455]:
>> >> >>>> >> > segfault at 0 ip           (null) sp 00007fff152c88f8 error
>> >> >>>> >> > 14
>> >> >>>> >> > in
>> >> >>>> >> > ossec-analysisd[400000+65000]
>> >> >>>> >> >
>> >> >>>> >> > Following the segfault, these are the ossec processes running
>> >> >>>> >> > (although
>> >> >>>> >> > sometimes syscheckd and/or monitord is not running):
>> >> >>>> >> >
>> >> >>>> >> > [root@smithers ossec]# ps -ef | grep ossec
>> >> >>>> >> > ossecm   12447     1  0 09:58 ?        00:00:00
>> >> >>>> >> > /var/ossec/bin/ossec-maild
>> >> >>>> >> > root     12451     1  0 09:58 ?        00:00:00
>> >> >>>> >> > /var/ossec/bin/ossec-execd
>> >> >>>> >> > root     12470     1  0 09:58 ?        00:00:03
>> >> >>>> >> > /var/ossec/bin/ossec-syscheckd
>> >> >>>> >> > ossec    12473     1  0 09:58 ?        00:00:00
>> >> >>>> >> > /var/ossec/bin/ossec-monitord
>> >> >>>> >> > root     13327 13302  0 13:12 pts/0    00:00:00 grep ossec
>> >> >>>> >> >
>> >> >>>> >> > Here is the ossec.log from start to finish (this time it took
>> >> >>>> >> > a
>> >> >>>> >> > couple
>> >> >>>> >> > of
>> >> >>>> >> > hours for the segfault to occur):
>> >> >>>> >> >
>> >> >>>> >> > [root@smithers ossec]# tail -f logs/ossec.log
>> >> >>>> >> > 2014/12/09 09:58:28 ossec-testrule: INFO: Reading local
>> >> >>>> >> > decoder
>> >> >>>> >> > file.
>> >> >>>> >> [snip]
>> >> >>>> >> > 2014/12/09 12:28:39 ossec-monitord: socketerr (not
>> >> >>>> >> > available).
>> >> >>>> >> > 2014/12/09 12:28:39 ossec-monitord(1224): ERROR: Error
>> >> >>>> >> > sending
>> >> >>>> >> > message
>> >> >>>> >> > to
>> >> >>>> >> > queue.
>> >> >>>> >> >
>> >> >>>> >> > Let me know if anything else would be helpful.
>> >> >>>> >> >
>> >> >>>> >>
>> >> >>>> >> I'm not seeing this issue on post 2.8.1 code, any chance you
>> >> >>>> >> can
>> >> >>>> >> upgrade to something remotely recent?
>> >> >>>> >>
>> >> >>>> >> > --
>> >> >>>> >> >
>> >> >>>> >> > ---
>> >> >>>> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>> >> >>>> >> > Google
>> >> >>>> >> > Groups
>> >> >>>> >> > "ossec-list" group.
>> >> >>>> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
>> >> >>>> >> > it,
>> >> >>>> >> > send
>> >> >>>> >> > an
>> >> >>>> >> > email to [email protected].
>> >> >>>> >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> >> >>>> >
>> >> >>>> > --
>> >> >>>> >
>> >> >>>> > ---
>> >> >>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>> >> >>>> > Google
>> >> >>>> > Groups
>> >> >>>> > "ossec-list" group.
>> >> >>>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
>> >> >>>> > it,
>> >> >>>> > send
>> >> >>>> > an
>> >> >>>> > email to [email protected].
>> >> >>>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ---
>> >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> >> >> Groups
>> >> >> "ossec-list" group.
>> >> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>> >> >> send
>> >> >> an
>> >> >> email to [email protected].
>> >> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > ---
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> > Groups
>> > "ossec-list" group.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>> > an
>> > email to [email protected].
>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "ossec-list" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ossec-list" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to