Hi Jon,

 
You solved the problem of rule? I had the same problem resolved my rule 

<rule id="100003" level="0">
   <if_sid>5104</if_sid>
   <hostname>FLOW</hostname>
   <match>device eth1 entered promiscuous mode</match>
   <description>device entered promiscuous mode</description>
   </rule>


Em quarta-feira, 12 de agosto de 2015 11:21:16 UTC-3, Jon Zeolla escreveu:
>
> *Example Rule*
>
> <var name="WHITELIST">^test-01$|^test-02$</var>
>
> <group name="local,syslog,">
>
>  <rule id="100099" level="0">
>
>   <if_sid>5104</if_sid>
>
>   <hostname>$WHITELIST</hostname>
>
>   <options>no_email_alert</options>
>
>   <description>Ignore promiscuous alerts for certain hosts</description>
>
>   <group>linuxkernel,promisc,</group>
>
>  </rule>
>
> </group>
>
>
>
> *Successful test*
>
> # ./ossec-logtest -f
>
> 2015/07/31 10:28:50 ossec-testrule: INFO: Reading local decoder file.
>
> 2015/07/31 10:28:50 ossec-testrule: INFO: Started (pid: 30517).
>
> ossec-testrule: Type one log per line.
>
>
> Jul 31 06:11:23 test-01 kernel: : [*] device eth0 entered promiscuous mode
>
>
>
> **Phase 1: Completed pre-decoding.
>
>        full event: 'Jul 31 06:11:23 test-01 kernel: : [*] device eth0 
> entered promiscuous mode'
>
>        hostname: ‘test-01'
>
>        program_name: 'kernel'
>
>        log: ': [*] device eth0 entered promiscuous mode'
>
>
> **Phase 2: Completed decoding.
>
>        decoder: 'iptables'
>
>
> **Rule debugging:
>
>     Trying rule: 1 - Generic template for all syslog rules.
>
>        *Rule 1 matched.
>
>        *Trying child rules.
>
> *<snip>*
>
>     Trying rule: 5100 - Pre-match rule for kernel messages
>
>        *Rule 5100 matched.
>
>        *Trying child rules.
>
> *<snip>*
>
>        *Rule 5104 matched.
>
>        *Trying child rules.
>
>     Trying rule: 100099 - Ignore promiscuous alerts for certain hosts
>
>        *Rule 100099 matched.
>
>
> **Phase 3: Completed filtering (rules).
>
>        Rule id: '100099'
>
>        Level: '0'
>
>        Description: ‘Ignore promiscuous alerts for certain hosts’
>
>
>
>
> However, I'm still getting email alerts for these systems which point to 
> it evaluating as 5104 only (i.e. 'Rule: 5104 fired (level 8) -> 
> "Interface entered in promiscuous(sniffing) mode."').  I've restarted the 
> OSSEC server after adding the new rule.  Any thoughts?  
>
>
> Jon
>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ossec-list" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to