On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 5:46 PM, James Stallings <[email protected]> wrote:
> I believe root cause here was a bunch of old OSSEC processes that were still
> holding an older config in memory even after I had cycled the daemons on
> several occasions. I no longer see the issue. Has anyone seen this sort of
> behavior before?
>

It's not common, but it does happen. You can probably find several
instances of it on the mailing list.

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ossec-list" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to