Not saving and restoring the rbp register causes tst-syscall to crash in
the debug build. With this patch, the debug build of this test no longer
crashes.

Once we do save %rbp, let's kill two birds in one stone, and also enable
backtrace_safe() (e.g., on abort) to go through the syscall_entry function
correctly. To do this, we need to set up the old-style frame pointer -
which means we need to push to the stack the return address (which we get
in %rcx), then the old %rbp, and then set %rbp to our %rsp.

Now there's an extra complication: Adding an odd number of 8-byte items
to the stack makes it, in my debug-build of the test, no longer 16-bytes
aligned. According to the C ABI, the stack must be 16-byte aligned when
calling a C function (syscall_wrapper()) - and the debug build has some
FPU-saving code which makes this assumptions, and crashes with #GP if not.

So we add in this patch also code to align the stack to 16 bytes before
calling the C function. We use a nice trick to do that without using up
another register.

Signed-off-by: Nadav Har'El <[email protected]>
---
 arch/x64/entry.S | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x64/entry.S b/arch/x64/entry.S
index 25f3cba..48a0a71 100644
--- a/arch/x64/entry.S
+++ b/arch/x64/entry.S
@@ -166,6 +166,13 @@ syscall_entry:
         .cfi_startproc simple
        # There is no ring transition and rflags are left unchanged.
 
+    # We need to save and restore the caller's %rbp anyway, so let's also
+    # set it up properly for old-style frame-pointer backtracing to work
+    # (e.g., backtrace_safe()). Also need to push the return address before
+    # the rbp to get a normal frame. Our return address is in rcx.
+    pushq %rcx
+    pushq %rbp
+    movq %rsp, %rbp
        #
        # From 
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2535989/what-are-the-calling-conventions-for-unix-linux-system-calls-on-x86-64:
        # "User-level applications use as integer registers for passing the 
sequence %rdi, %rsi, %rdx, %rcx, %r8 and %r9. The kernel interface uses %rdi, 
%rsi, %rdx, %r10, %r8 and %r9"
@@ -229,8 +236,26 @@ syscall_entry:
        # syscall number from rax as first argument
        movq %rax, %rdi
 
+    # align stack to 16 bytes, as required by the ABI.
+    # Counting the pushes above is not enough because we don't know what was
+    # the stack alignment initially (syscall is not a function call so it can
+    # be called with any stack alignment). An additional complication is that
+    # we need to restore %rsp later without knowing how it was previously
+    # aligned. In the following trick, not using an additional register, the
+    # two pushes leave the stack with the same alignment it had originally,
+    # and a copy of the original %rsp at (%rsp) and 8(%rsp). The andq then
+    # aligns the stack - if it was already 16 byte aligned nothing changes, if
+    # it was 8 byte aligned then it subtracts 8 from %rsp, meaning that the
+    # original %rsp is now at 8(%rsp) and 16(%rsp). In both cases we can
+    # restore it from 8(%rsp).
+    pushq %rsp
+    pushq (%rsp)
+    andq $-0x10, %rsp
+
        callq syscall_wrapper
 
+    movq 8(%rsp), %rsp
+
        popq %r9
        # in Linux user and kernel return value are in rax so we have nothing 
to do for return values
 
@@ -251,6 +276,9 @@ syscall_entry:
         addq $8, %rsp  # rip emplacement (rip cannot be popped)
        popq %rsp
 
+    popq %rbp
+    popq %rcx
+
        # jump to rcx where the syscall instruction put rip
        # (sysret would leave rxc cloberred so we have nothing to do to restore 
it)
        jmpq *%rcx
-- 
2.7.4

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OSv 
Development" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to