> On 23 Apr 2017, at 05:14, Nadav Har'El <n...@scylladb.com> wrote: > > Pekka, another question we should ask ourselves is what is the plan with > Capstan, and more importantly, the binary OSv releases. The OSv v0.24 version > he used is two years old (!). If we're not going to produce any more > pre-compiled releases (are we?) should we at least remove the antique ones > and force people to compile OSv on their own before using Capstan? Or should > we make another release? Or what?
On this front, I have a rebar_osv plugin for the erlang ‘rebar’ build tool that will take an erlang release and build an OSv image. Its simpler to port an erlang OTP application to OSv that way than using the apps/erlang setup. It will also include a recent OSv base image (as I use the same method of CPIO-ing in the files). Hope to release that soon - are you ok with me including an OSv base image? Cheers, Rick -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OSv Development" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to osv-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
