On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 9:43 AM Waldek Kozaczuk <[email protected]> wrote:
> Indeed I have come across some incompatibility issues. Mostly around > configuration but nothing very fundamental. You can see in some of my > comments. > Right, I missed the comments because the diff is somewhat large. ;-) I would suggest to do Firecracker support in the following (largely independent) steps: - Add support for modern virtio interfaces. Linux has a split driver base model here, which we could also follow. I.e., have separate VirtioModern and VirtioLegacy base classes that encapsulate the differences. - Add support for VirtIO MMIO. Most of this is restructuring the drivers to use transport-independent interfaces and then have VirtioPCI and VirtioMMIO classes that implement transport-specific logic. - Add Intel mptable (used by Firecracker) support as an alternative to ACPI hardware discovery. - Add any misc Firecraker related things that are still needed to make OSv boot and run. - Pekka -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OSv Development" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
