I approved your merge request. I think your changes are now visible now on osv.io.
Waldek On Wednesday, February 17, 2021 at 12:07:35 AM UTC-5 Matthew Kenigsberg wrote: > Will do, thanks! > > Matthew > > On Tuesday, February 16, 2021 at 11:06:06 PM UTC-6 [email protected] > wrote: > >> I agree with a lot of your sentiments. Just create a merge request with >> whatever you think. >> >> Waldek >> >> On Thursday, February 11, 2021 at 5:08:47 PM UTC-5 Matthew Kenigsberg >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Couldn't find that repo, I was looking in cloudius-systems 🤦♂️ >>> >>> I'm looking at the "Learn More" portion of the site and I have a few >>> ideas: >>> The separation between Design/Technology/Spinlock-free design doesn't >>> seem very clear, and there's a section about spinlock-free design in the >>> Technology section which seems like duplication. >>> >>> I'm guessing this has been discussed before, but personally I felt like >>> NewRelic and Jolokia JMX pages belong more on the wiki. >>> >>> Wanted to ask about this partially to check my own understanding, but I >>> think in Use Cases, FAQ, and maybe the home page, it should be made more >>> clear how OSv relates to containers. As far as I can tell, in general OSv >>> does not have a performance advantage over containers. Some of the docs >>> talk about the benefit of eliminating context switching, which is an >>> advantage compared to a full fledged VM, but there's still a context switch >>> between KVM and the host OS. Techniques to eliminate that context switch >>> (virtio-user/DPDK >>> and SR-IOV) are also available to containers. If I'm understanding that >>> correctly, I think the docs should more clearly reflect that OSv is a good >>> alternative to Linux VMs, but it might not perform better than a container. >>> >>> Let me know what you think of any of that! >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Matthew >>> >>> On Thursday, February 11, 2021 at 12:04:40 PM UTC-6 [email protected] >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Matthew, >>>> >>>> Also if you have any ideas on how to improve look-and-feel or >>>> organization of it please let me know. I did some cleanup 1-2 years ago >>>> but >>>> I feel it needs more love. >>>> >>>> Give me a couple of days to remember what the process of the update is >>>> and I will follow up on this email. I think it should be as easy as a pull >>>> request to proper repo. >>>> >>>> Here is a starting point - readme in >>>> https://github.com/osv-io/osv-io.github.io and another repo - >>>> https://github.com/osv-io/blog. From what I remember osv.io uses >>>> Jekyll (it used to be octopress which I migrated to native Jekyll). >>>> >>>> Waldek >>>> >>>> On Thursday, February 11, 2021 at 12:50:29 PM UTC-5 דור לאור wrote: >>>> >>>>> Sure, in the case of a single article, best is to post it to the list >>>>> for review and add a target location, if it's multiple changes, we >>>>> can eventually add you to the www github project >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 8:09 AM Matthew Kenigsberg < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> Is there somewhere I can contribute to docs on osv.io? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Matthew >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "OSv Development" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osv-dev/c7dede83-c5c9-4bbb-ae8b-af900348f58en%40googlegroups.com >>>>>> >>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osv-dev/c7dede83-c5c9-4bbb-ae8b-af900348f58en%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>> . >>>>>> >>>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OSv Development" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osv-dev/2ac4d8ef-e917-48ca-b7a9-9ab95addb896n%40googlegroups.com.
