On 2008-Aug-31, at 14:27, Matt Johnston wrote: >> I have no idea. Do you? If they grew from 850 to 2100 in ~20 >> years I >> doubt it's something like 50 or even 200. > > I reckon a population is safe when there's tens of thousands, in > separate populations. A single population of 2100 seems ripe for a > quick wipe out from a single pathogen.
I'm confused, the wikipedia page says there are up to 25 000 worldwide... is this one "subpopulation" that's endangered? I'm for protecting them, just wondering about numbers. Stefano _______________________________________________ OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected] http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters List hosted at http://cat5.org/
