On Sep 2, 2008, at 3:09 PM, LuKreme wrote: > On 2-Sep-2008, at 12:24, Charles Bennett wrote: >> On Sep 2, 2008, at 1:42 PM, LuKreme wrote: >>> On 2-Sep-2008, at 11:27, Charles Bennett wrote: >>>> Peaceful protest my ass. >>> >> I think the point is that "peaceful" was never the intent of the >> people involved. > > Really? 100% of the people? 1% of the people? Less than 1%?
Sorry. "The people involved" was meant to mean the one's with weapons or tossing sand bags from overpasses. > > >> I think the intent was to stop the violence not necessarily the >> protest. > > Riiiiight. Sure it was. > >> Wasn't "bring back 68'" part of the protesters goals and posters? I >> was there. Bringing back 68 brings with it a whole host of risks. > > Wasn't that the fizzled protest in Denver? > >> The police say they reacted to bottles and rocks being thrown at >> them. > > The large group that was tear gassed was peaceful by all accounts. Well. not by "all" accounts. That's why I'm assuming that security cams and other video will reveal what really happened. =c= _______________________________________________ OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected] http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters List hosted at http://cat5.org/
