On 3-Sep-2008, at 07:23, Charles Bennett wrote:
> On Sep 2, 2008, at 3:09 PM, LuKreme wrote:
>> On 2-Sep-2008, at 12:24, Charles Bennett wrote:
>>> On Sep 2, 2008, at 1:42 PM, LuKreme wrote:
>>>> On 2-Sep-2008, at 11:27, Charles Bennett wrote:
>>>>> Peaceful protest my ass.
>>>>
>>> I think the point is that "peaceful" was never the intent of the
>>> people involved.
>>
>> Really? 100% of the people? 1% of the people? Less than 1%?
>
> Sorry. "The people involved" was meant to mean the one's with weapons
> or tossing sand bags from overpasses.
Ah, so the people who were tear gassed and set upon by baton-wielding
thugs--er--police were not involved?
Glad to see we are all on the same page then.
>> The large group that was tear gassed was peaceful by all accounts.
>
> Well. not by "all" accounts.
Sorry, all INDEPENDENT accounts. You know, like the reporters who
managed to NOT get arrested for, you know, being reporters.
> That's why I'm assuming that security cams and other video will reveal
> what really happened.
I'm sure this will all magically go away under various terms of the so-
called Patriot Act.
>
--
"You can think and you can fight, but the world's always movin',
and if you wanna stay ahead you gotta dance."
_______________________________________________
OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected]
http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters
List hosted at http://cat5.org/
