On Tue, January 27, 2009 10:38 am, Chris Gehlker wrote: > > I'm confused. Why investigate something that is not in dispute. > Apparently the UN and the US senate agree on what Rumsfeld did. What > is there to investigate?
Maybe I'm misunderstanding your question, but surely you understand the need to have a proper investigation to establish the facts of the matter and to support any prosecution. Just because two groups appear to agree that something bad happened doesn't mean there's enough, yet, for a full prosecution. We're at the pre-grand jury stage it seems - several groups believe we've got a strong enough case for an indictment; but there are likely many gaps to fill in before a prosecution can move forwrd. Particularly because any investigations now have largely been outside the process - enough to establish possible wrong-doing, but there will have to be a massive investigation to support what will no doubt be a massive trial if one were to occur. _______________________________________________ OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected] http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters List hosted at http://cat5.org/
