On 10-Feb-2009, at 08:09, Charles Bennett wrote:
> On Feb 10, 2009, at 12:02 AM, Lawrence Sica wrote:
>> On Feb 9, 2009, at 9:32 PM, Roger Howard wrote:
>>> On Feb 9, 2009, at 1:11 PM, LuKreme wrote:
>>>> On Feb 9, 2009, at 12:04, Mark Smith <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 7:54 PM, Kevin Callahan <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I really hope people are held accountable for this
>>>>>
>>>>> That would make for a refreshing change.
>>>>
>>>> It would, but we all know nothing is going to happen.
>>>
>>> Obama fails first test on civil liberties and accountability
>>> http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/02/09/state_secrets/
>>
>> I am curious the full reasoning. There must be something pretty
>> bad in there when you consider all the other things he is doing. T
>
> So that would imply that Bush might have been right to keep it a
> state secret no?
That doesn't follow. It is much more likely that now that the damage
has been done, reveling just what kind of shit Bush allowed (or
mandated) is not a good idea.
--
If fashion is your trade then when you're naked I guess you must be
unemployed.
_______________________________________________
OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected]
http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters
List hosted at http://cat5.org/
