On Apr 18, 2009, at 11:59 AM, Lawrence Sica wrote:


On Apr 18, 2009, at 2:52 PM, Kevin Callahan wrote:

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/04/17-7

Obama:
"This is a time for reflection, not retribution. . . . But at a time of great challenges and disturbing disunity, nothing will be gained by spending our time and energy laying blame for the past. Our national greatness is embedded in America's ability to right its course in concert with our core values, and to move forward with confidence. That is why we must resist the forces that divide us, and instead come together on behalf of our common future."



Greenwald:

That passage, more than anything else, is the mindset that has destroyed the rule of law in the U.S. and spawned massive criminality in our elite class. Accountability for crimes committed by political leaders (as opposed to ordinary Americans) is scorned as "retribution" and "laying blame for the past." Those who believe that the rule of law should be applied to the powerful as well as to ordinary citizens are demonized as the "forces that divide us." The bottomless corruption of immunizing political elites for serious crimes is glorified in the most Orwellian terms as "a time for reflection," "moving forward," and "coming together on behalf of our common future."


And in the process destroy what remains of our government? Retribution is nice,

it's not "retribution"

torture has always been against the law


but one does not cut off their nose to spite their face. There are times when it is better to forgive, or perhaps take a step back and look at what must be done without a quick knee jerk reaction. It was quick reactions without thought that put us in this mess imho.

There is no point in prosecuting anyone who may have been involved if it ends up creating a permanent divide. Someone needs to pay but let's be smart about who we choose to go after. I am glad Obama has said he won't go after rank and file. Note he's not said he won't go after those who made the decisions.

right -
and John Dean said their is precedent for those who followed what they thought was the law, in good faith - ie: no prosecuting those who actually did the deeds.

we'll have to see where this goes


--Larry
_______________________________________________
OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected]
http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters
List hosted at http://cat5.org/

_______________________________________________
OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected]
http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters
List hosted at http://cat5.org/

Reply via email to