I do agree with you, very much... --ryan
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Chris Gehlker <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jun 1, 2009, at 9:50 AM, Charles Bennett wrote: > > > Just in case you think it's all fat cats. > > > > > http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/2009/06/01/bondholder-furious-over-gm-bankruptcy/ > > > > Wrong union I guess. > > Are you complaining that the administration is too 'socialist' or not > socialist enough. > > > > My actual question is a simple. By what Constitutional authority can > > the Govt. hold any shares of GM and give preferential treatment to > > campaign donors (Autoworkers Uniion) > > > > I'm truly surprised that this isn't on the way to the Supreme Court to > > be challenged. > > Crony capitalism, er public-private partnerships, has been a fixture > of government at all levels and under both parties at least since the > Reagan administration. > > > > (Same for the Banks and Chrysler too) > > > > If I had wanted stock in these dogs, I would have bought them > > directly, not via my Congress Critter. > > I can't help seeing the auto company bailouts as more benign and as > serving a greater public purpose than the interventions in the > financial sector. I wonder if the nutters agree. > > > --- > Just because they're good at propaganda doesn't mean we have to be > good at stupid. > -Marty Kaplan > > _______________________________________________ > OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected] > http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters > List hosted at http://cat5.org/ >
_______________________________________________ OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected] http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters List hosted at http://cat5.org/
