On Jun 9, 2009, at 5:48 PM, Arno Hautala wrote: > On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 18:58, Kevin Callahan<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I was wondering about the samples, myself > > http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM > > The abstract itself mentions, and the paper elaborates on, the fact > that the samples (all 4) were collected from Manhattan residents > responding to a request for samples.
i know -- that's why I wondered if they'd been tampered with ... we can't assume they were .. but we can't assume they were not in other words, just because they COULD be bad samples, doesn't mean they are > > Another fun bit from the paper: > "The expectation at that time was that a careful examination of the > dust might yield evidence to support the hypothesis that explosive > materials other than jet fuel caused the extraordinarily rapid and > essentially total destruction of the WTC buildings." > > I suspect that the original request for samples included text to the > same effect. sure doesn't mean the samples were tampered with -- just means we need more of an investigation I wonder if China still has any of the steel beams hanging around so they can be examined K > > -- _______________________________________________ OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected] http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters List hosted at http://cat5.org/
