At 4:58 PM +0000 12/11/09, Jared Earle wrote:
>On 12 Nov 2009, at 16:54, Lawrence Sica wrote:
>> Nope. They don't share the kernel, also the userland is not 100%
>> FreeBSD, mostly I believe. It's also missing a lot of bits that would
>> make it a truly useable OS without OS X.
>
>
>Oh, and it's not got Ports.
>
>Well, it has, but not to the same degree.
For various reasons, I've been using MacPorts quite a bit
lately. It is definitely a step down in usefulness from what I'm used
to with apt-get etc (and I assume FreeBSD ports, though I've never
been a FreeBSD user).
While I am at it, given I've happily used Debian for years,
are there good reasons why I should give FreeBSD a try?
Cheers
David
_______________________________________________
OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected]
http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters
List hosted at http://cat5.org/
