On 30 Nov 2009, at 21:35, Mark Smith wrote:
> So I took the time to write a shorter response. I was way up in the
> thousands of words when I decided to do a radical edit...
>
> Chuck is right to rant on the big general issue. Its one huge,
> horrible scandal.
Well, there's also the difference between the superficial appearance
of a few things taken out of context ... and what appears when putting
things back _into_ context, as well as when looking at more than just
the 'juiciest bits'.
This video seems offer a bit of a more rational perspective:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nnVQ2fROOg
Best wishes,
// Christian Brunschen
> However, it seems to me to be fuzzier in some of the
> details than the outraged (busy as ever being righteously and
> flagrantly outraged) are allowing. I doubt we are going to get the
> cool reflection that we obviously need. There are far too many people
> who won't be able to resist getting the big white pointy hats out of
> the cupboard.
>
> Terrible subject line though Chuck. If you take a cool look at the
> situation, you should see that the whole thing has relatively little
> to do with the quality, or management of code.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected]
> http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters
> List hosted at http://cat5.org/
_______________________________________________
OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected]
http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters
List hosted at http://cat5.org/