Then we also need to look at Bhopal and get rid of the pesticides, how about
the 40K+ people here in the US who die each year in auto accidents. There
are underground coal fires that have resulted in the complete abandonment of
small towns. Oil spills, etc.

I'll take nuclear power any day.

Regards,
David Kearney



-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Luttrell PWRCOM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 3:03 PM
To: Open Topic Forum
Subject: RE: [OT] Re: [PEDA] Lead free - *was* re design


Very funny. Tell that to the victims of Chernobyl.

Nuclear fusion carried out in the depths of space is one thing. 

Nuclear fission on a planets surface where the biota are susceptible to
death from the radioactive by-products that have a half life longer than any
containment system known is not big or clever.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kearney, David
> Sent: Friday, 10 December 2004 9:50 AM
> To: 'Open Topic Forum'
> Subject: RE: [OT] Re: [PEDA] Lead free - *was* re design
> 
> Since it was created... Shortly after Creation!
> 
> Regards,
> David Kearney
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Luttrell PWRCOM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 2:49 PM
> To: Open Topic Forum
> Subject: RE: [OT] Re: [PEDA] Lead free - *was* re design
> 
> 
> Since when has nuclear power been good for the environment?
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, 10 December 2004 12:09 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [OT] Re: [PEDA] Lead free - *was* re design
> > 
> > Yes, because in Europe it is produced using Nuclear power, and in 
> > Asia by burning coal. Of course that's good.
> > 
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >On Behalf Of Dennis Saputelli
> > >Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 6:47 PM
> > >To: Open Topic Forum
> > >Subject: Re: [OT] Re: [PEDA] Lead free - *was* re design
> > >
> > >
> > >no one has mentioned (lately)
> > >the significantly higher energy use for lead free (higher temps)
> > >
> > >is this good for the environment ?
> > >
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the OT discussion forum
> 
> To Post messages:
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Unsubscribe and Other Options: 
> http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/ot_techservinc.com
> 
> Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004): 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>  
> Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current): 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the OT discussion forum
> 
> To Post messages:
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Unsubscribe and Other Options: 
> http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/ot_techservinc.com
> 
> Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004): 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>  
> Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current): 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
> 
> 

____________________________________________________________
You are subscribed to the OT discussion forum

To Post messages:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Unsubscribe and Other Options:
http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/ot_techservinc.com

Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
 
Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

____________________________________________________________
You are subscribed to the OT discussion forum

To Post messages:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Unsubscribe and Other Options:
http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/ot_techservinc.com

Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
 
Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to