I think the intent of the original poster was that it was not good for the environment

i guess he forgot to put the smiley face

ditto his comment about coal

being factitious by email is always risky

which brings us back to the point
that tinkering with things for feel-good reasons can sometimes backfire bigtime (often? - i live in san francisco)


ds

_______________________________________________________________________
Integrated Controls, Inc.           Tel: 415-647-0480  EXT 107
2851 21st Street                    Fax: 415-647-3003
San Francisco, CA 94110             www.integratedcontrolsinc.com


Tom Luttrell PWRCOM wrote:
Very funny. Tell that to the victims of Chernobyl.

Nuclear fusion carried out in the depths of space is one thing.

Nuclear fission on a planets surface where the biota are susceptible to
death from the radioactive by-products that have a half life longer than
any containment system known is not big or clever.


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kearney, David
Sent: Friday, 10 December 2004 9:50 AM
To: 'Open Topic Forum'
Subject: RE: [OT] Re: [PEDA] Lead free - *was* re design


Since it was created... Shortly after Creation!

Regards,
David Kearney



-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Luttrell PWRCOM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 2:49 PM
To: Open Topic Forum
Subject: RE: [OT] Re: [PEDA] Lead free - *was* re design


Since when has nuclear power been good for the environment?



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 10 December 2004 12:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OT] Re: [PEDA] Lead free - *was* re design

Yes, because in Europe it is produced using Nuclear power,
and in Asia by burning coal. Of course that's good.



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


On Behalf Of Dennis Saputelli
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 6:47 PM
To: Open Topic Forum
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: [PEDA] Lead free - *was* re design


no one has mentioned (lately) the significantly higher energy use for lead free (higher temps)

is this good for the environment ?


____________________________________________________________ You are subscribed to the OT discussion forum

To Post messages:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Unsubscribe and Other Options:
http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/ot_techservinc.com

Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to