No matter the size of the slicing window, the image I get as inverse of NA-PCA is identical to the input image. While this makes sense for regular PCA, AFAIK NA-PCA should estimate the noise and render a denoised image as inverse. Am I wrong? Is the method not well implemented?
Also, what the user normally wish is estimating the noise from a particularly uniform image (or part of an image) and then read in the covariance matrix and feed it to calculate the inverse NA-PCA of another image. Any way of doing that with otb? Thanks Agus -- -- Check the OTB FAQ at http://www.orfeo-toolbox.org/FAQ.html You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "otb-users" group. To post to this group, send email to otb-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to otb-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/otb-users?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "otb-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to otb-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.