Guillaume, many thanks for this improvement, it certainly will make scripts much cleaner. Regarding your questions:
.../... > > We would like to have your feedback on several points : > > - We will likely change the keyword "*band*" to plural "*bands*", no > objection ? > > No problem, actually better > > - Is the syntax clear / convenient / confusing ? > > I will not be using the "-" (e.g. -1) because I find it counterintuitive (in R this would mean drop band 1), but there is no problem letting it be if other people do like it. > > - There can be a debate between 0-based and 1-based indexing for band > numbers. At the moment, it is not uniform in OTB but we think that 1-based > indexing should be the convention exposed to the user. > > Strongly support the 1-based. > > - It is also possible to implement it on image writers, would it help > ? What would be your use-cases ? > > Yes! In some cases the user might want not to save all bands. Regards, Agus -- -- Check the OTB FAQ at http://www.orfeo-toolbox.org/FAQ.html You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "otb-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/otb-users?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "otb-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
