Ron, how do chiropractors explain their chosen professional descriptor?
It doesn't seem to be an issue for them. Once again, I say that we
should just publicize what we do so everyone knows about us, and stop
worrying about the lingo. The only ones who are interested in our lingo
are ourselves, particularly academics, among whom I count myself.
Perhaps you would like to know about our new doctoral program in
Occupational Technology. A new addition to our professional lingo. Dr.
Estelle Breines, Seton Hall University
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Of Ron Carson
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 9:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bridging a Communication Gap
Hello All:
In a previous topic (one that didn't get many responses), I asked
about using the term 'occupation' versus 'function'.
For arguments sake, let's say the general consensus is that
occupational therapists should use the term 'occupation' as much as
possible while still being able to effectively communicate with a
diverse audience [i.e. doctors, payeers, other therapists, etc]. How
then, do we as individuals go about bridging the obvious communication
gap between 'us' and 'them' [them being our audience]?
Ron
--
Ron Carson MHS, OTR/L
Assistant Professor
University of Saint Augustine
1 University Blvd.
St. Augustine, FL 32086
904.826.0084
********************
Unsubscribe by sending a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the
message's body, put the following text:
unsubscribe OTlist
------
OTnow messages are archived at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] (and)
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
********rC***********
********************
Unsubscribe by sending a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the message's body, put
the following text:
unsubscribe OTlist
------
OTnow messages are archived at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] (and)
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
********rC***********
