Hello Jody:

I  am sorry but I don't understand the need to call a 'truce'. I didn't
even perceive that things were getting heated up. Personally, I believe
that  while  a  few  people  may  grow weary of the conversations about
occupation, many others on the list benefit from the dialogue.

I  will  continue  to  answer the previous messages about occupation. I
other  readers  wish to not read and/or answer then they have the power
in  their  right  hand  (i.e.  del). I hope that there are just as many
readers who do want the occupation discussions to continue.

I  know  from  past  experience  that  it  can  be difficult separating
personal from professional. I try to never let my comments digress into
personal  attacks.  So  again,  please don't think that my comments are
directed to any singular person.

Thanks,

Ron

======================================================
On 10/11/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

Sac> As Vickie requests, I am willing to call a truce.  Thank you to the cooler 
Sac> heads who spoke my position more clearly than I. 

Sac>  Ron asks me
Sac> "Please� don't� assume that I am passing 'judgement' about yours or any other
Sac> therapist's practice patterns. "

Sac> I will do that and move on.   We need a new topic. 

Sac> -- Jody


Sac> In a message dated 10/10/2002 8:09:52 AM Central Daylight Time, 
Sac> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


>> Gosh Vickie, I'm just getting wound up! <grin>
>> 
>> By  the  way,  I'm on the way out the door to go work with patients. Maybe I
>> can put some of my words into action like you suggest! <grin again>
>> 
>> No  offense  taken.  This is an open forum and everyone is entitled to their
>> professional opinion. <not grinning>
>> 
>> 
>> Ron
>> 

*********��***********

Unsubscribe? Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In the message's *body*, put the following text: unsubscribe OTlist

** List messages are archived at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/otlist@;otnow.com

*********��***********

Reply via email to