Impact, now that's a good question.

Honestly,  the  only reason I posted it was to raise awareness. It seems
that at many levels, OT suffers from a lack of awareness - from doctor's
not  knowing  about  us,  to  insurance  companies  who  don't cover our
services,  to  OT's  who  don't  know  about  these  inequities. Raising
awareness  is the same reason why I posted the message about Ask Jeeves'
definition of OT. And all of this goes back to Fred Sommers' (spelling?)
statement  about  OT  being  posed  to  be a premier provider of therapy
services.  In  my  opinion and experience, OT is far behind PT on almost
every level, that it's not even funny. All this is not to say that PT is
our  standard,  but  the sad reality is that on some (many) levels, they
are  our  direct  competitors. Now, I know there are many therapists who
have  great  friendships and working relationships with PTs, and so have
I,  but we SHOULD not kid ourselves into believing that as a profession,
PT is our ally, well at least in areas that are competitive.

Am  I encountering problems, well actually, the whole reason this became
an issue is because First Coast denied payment for a wound care procedure
simply  because  of  my  speciality.  And  come  to  find out, their own
documentation conflicts because it supports payment for my provider type
(i.e.  PT) but not my speciality (i.e OT). They are unsure of what to do
and I am confused as to why there's no provider type for OT.


Ron

----- Original Message -----
From: Charles Willmarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005
To:   [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subj: [OTlist] Medicare and OT

CW> Ron,

CW> I guess my question is, what is the impact?   Are you encountering
CW> problems because of this?

CW> Chuck

>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/25/2005 12:17:34 PM >>>
CW> Chuck,  what  you've  found  are  the SPECIALITY codes, not the
CW> PROVIDER
CW> TYPES.

CW> Yes,  there  is  a  speciality  code for an OT in PP, but there is NOT
CW> a
CW> provider  type  for  an OT. I am unsure if this is a FCSO 'problem' or
CW> a
CW> CMS problem.

CW> By the way, you are great researcher.

CW> Ron

CW> ----- Original Message -----
CW> From: Charles Willmarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CW> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005
CW> To:   [email protected] <[email protected]>
CW> Subj: [OTlist] Medicare and OT

CW>> Ron,

CW>> I found this list of MEDICARE PROVIDER/SUPPLIER SPECIALTY CODES. 
CW>> Interestingly I don't see a provider type 31.

CW>>
CW> 
http://www.floridamedicare.com/1common_resource_enroll_Provider_Supplier%20Specialty%20Codes.asp#TopOfPage


CW>> 25 - Physical Medicine and Rehab.
CW>> 31 - no listing 
CW>> 65 - Physical Therapist (Private Practice)
CW>> 67 - Occupational Therapist (Private Practice)



CW> -- 
CW> Unsubscribe?
CW>   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

CW> Change options?
CW>   www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com 

CW> Archive?
CW>   www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] 

CW> Help?
CW>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
Unsubscribe?
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Change options?
  www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com 

Archive?
  www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Help?
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to