[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi Linda > Yes i think its a good idea. One of the OT's i work with did hers on > sexuality as a PADL and how we dont address the issue as OT's
We don't? Duh - then I sure am in deep trouble:-) (Or more likely - we live in different parts of the world!) susanne, denmark - where it *is* the role of OTs to address sexual needs PS to Linda - try searching the archives of this group - we did discuss sexuality and OT before. The "plissit" model, for example, and also some cases. >> Message Received: Jan 18 2006, 11:50 AM >> From: "Linda Hicks" >> To: [email protected] >> Cc: >> Subject: Re: [OTlist] literature review >> >> I am sending this out into the ether in the hope that some of you >> great OTs out there can help me! This is the question--Is it the >> role of OTs to address the sexual needs of older disabled people and >> their carers? This is the beginning of the formulation of a research >> question. >> Do you think it is in the domain of OT to address sexuality? Are we, >> as people who profess to practice holistically, viewing the person >> as an integrated whole missing out a great chunk of who they are if >> we do not acknowledge sexual needs. For this purpose I am defining >> sexual needs to include all things intimate not merely the act of >> sex. If you have any views or can point me in the direction of >> someone who has please respond. >> Linda -- Unsubscribe? [EMAIL PROTECTED] Change options? www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com Archive? www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] Help? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
