Mary...very well said.  Just to add and maybe simplify.  There are actually two 
seperate issues we are dealing with...ethics and what Medicare requires.  When 
discussing this issue I believe ethics is not the right word, but customer 
service is.  The DME company should provide better customer service to their 
customers to decrease the risk of the patient having to pay for the wheelchair.
   
  As for what Medicare requires; they have group everything from a cane, 
walker, wheelchair, scooter and power wheelchair into a group called mobility 
adaptive equipment.  Medicare requires that you justify what is the least 
restrictive device in the home setting for their MRADLs as Mary stated.  You do 
not necessarily have to have a specific OT/PT eval but you need the 
documentation.  Some documentation you need is their functional status for 
eating, dressing, bathing a grooming, UE evaluation to justify why they cannot 
use a standard wheelchair, cogntive status that they can operate a powered 
device and some where demonstrated that they can operate the recommended 
device. Also, it is the DME companies responsibility to do a home evaluation to 
verify the device can be used within the home.
  Just as a background I am an OT operating a DME company.  Please feel free to 
ask me any questions. I have recently gone to a seminar on this specific topic 
becuase of the recent changes with power mobility.  
  Also, please give me feedback on your positive and negative experiences with 
DME companies.
   
  Greg Stelmach, OTR/L
  

Mary Alice Cafiero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  I don't have the current CMS reference but currently CMS is not 
requiring a therapist evaluation. They are requiring that a patient 
be seen for a face-to-face evaluation with their physician within 60 
days of the wheelchair prescription. Many physicians are able to 
identify and document the mobility limitation of
their patient but are not able to sufficiently document the patient’s
functional ability to perform MRADLs within their home. Whereas a 
therapist
is more able to thoroughly address the patient’s mobility limitations 
and
identify which piece of Mobility Assistive Equipment will meet the 
patient’s
needs. Keeping in mind that the least costly alternatives must be 
tried or
at least considered and ruled out if a PMD is going to be considered for
payment. Medicare has made it clear that for these situations the 
ordering
physician may refer the patient to the PT/OT to perform a wheelchair
assessment. However, the therapist performing this wheelchair assessment
cannot have a financial relationship with the supplier of the equipment.
This physician ordered wheelchair assessment is reimbursable through
Medicare Part B. The physician may then sign the therapist's 
evaluation to show their agreement with the findings.

So at this point, the therapist is not technically required to do the 
evaluation, but is often called upon to do the evaluation that the 
physician then signs off on. The word is that the future of Medicare 
will be a therapist evaluation as a requirement for a power 
wheelchair. Even more interesting is that the current plan is that 
the therapist will have to be an ATP (Assistive Technology 
Practitioner through RESNA) by 2008 (I think April).

Does that make sense?

Mary Alice
On Feb 5, 2007, at 6:32 PM, Ron Carson wrote:

> I am no longer 100% up to date on Medicare regs, but I'm pretty
> certain that a therapist eval is NOT required. I believe it is true
> that there must not be any monetary exchange between the therapist and
> the DME. Will someone cite a CMS reference concerning the therapist
> requirement for an eval?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ron
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Chris Smith 
> Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007
> To: [email protected] 
> Subj: [OTlist] ethical wheelchair question
>
> CS> Absolutely not! The DME's have to have a therapist do the
> CS> eval and write the med necessity letter. If you don't cooperate
> CS> they won't be able to make their sale. If you are in a snf you
> CS> need to explain to the administrator why is this unethical and the
> CS> snf needs to protect their residents against these scum bag
> CS> vendors by not allowing them into the facility. However if the pts
> CS> are in independent living or their own homes then you can't do as
> CS> much to prevent this. This is why medicare now requires a
> CS> therapist not employed by the vendor to do the eval. I would talk
> CS> to the reputable vendors about the problem they want it stopped,
> CS> too. Often they will work to educate health care managers. Good
> CS> luck. Chris
>
> CS> _______________________________________________
> CS> Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
> CS> The most personalized portal on the Web!
>
>
> -- 
> Options?
> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com
>
> Archive?
> www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>
> ********************************************************************** 
> ****************
> Enroll in Boston University's post-professional Master of Science 
> for OTs Online. Gain the skills and credentials to propel your career.
> www.otdegree.com/otn
> ********************************************************************** 
> ****************


-- 
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com 

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

**************************************************************************************
Enroll in Boston University's post-professional Master of Science for OTs 
Online. Gain the skills and credentials to propel your career.
www.otdegree.com/otn
**************************************************************************************

-- 
Options?
  www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com 

Archive?
  www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

**************************************************************************************
Enroll in Boston University's post-professional Master of Science for OTs 
Online. Gain the skills and credentials to propel your career.
www.otdegree.com/otn
**************************************************************************************

Reply via email to