Thanks LeAnn!

When  you  say  focus  on  the  UE,  I  THINK you are qualifying that by
referencing "functional tasks", is that correct? Personally, I feel that
PT's  are  better  UE  musculo-skeletal professionals that MOST (but not
all)  OT's.  I  believe  that  PT's  get more comprehensive and in-depth
musculo-skeletal analysis and treatments than MOST (but not all) OT's.

LeAnn, does what you are saying line up with our professional documents,
such as the Practice Framework?

Thanks,

Ron

----- Original Message -----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007
To:   [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subj: [OTlist] OTlist Digest, Vol 31, Issue 8

lso> To  state that OT focuses on the UE is a simplistic view However, I
lso> do  believe  that  OT's  do  focus on the UE better than PT. Simply
lso> because  we  look at how a patient is able to use their hand or arm
lso> to  complete  functional  tasks  i.e. brushing teeth, combing hair,
lso> pulling  up  pants,  writing,opening  jars  etc..  We  are also the
lso> primary  providers  of  joint  protection,  splinting, and adaptive
lso> utensils  and  all  which require hand and UE functions. Physicians
lso> have come to rely on OT's to provide this information and if we are
lso> not  skilled in evaluating UE function in relationship to strength,
lso> sensation,  ROM,  tone  and spasticity we are doing a disservice to
lso> our  clients  by  not  being  able  to  give  their  physicians the
lso> appropriate  information. Payors also want this information because
lso> they can understand it better. If giving that simplistic definition
lso> gets an OT in the door to providing treatment we can then show them
lso> how much more we can offer. Don't get defensive about it. Use it to
lso> your advantage! LeAnn Lee, OTR/L Albany General Hospital Albany, OR

lso> -----Original Message-----
lso> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
lso> Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lso> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 12:00 PM
lso> To: [email protected]
lso> Subject: OTlist Digest, Vol 31, Issue 8


lso> Send OTlist mailing list submissions to
lso>         [email protected]

lso> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
lso>         http://otnow.com/mailman/listinfo/otlist_otnow.com
lso> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
lso>         [EMAIL PROTECTED]

lso> You can reach the person managing the list at
lso>         [EMAIL PROTECTED]

lso> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
lso> than "Re: Contents of OTlist digest..."


lso> Today's Topics:

lso>    1. OT's and Upper Extremity (Ron Carson)
lso>    2. Re: OT's and Upper Extremity (Johnson, Arley)


lso> ----------------------------------------------------------------------

lso> Message: 1
lso> Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 07:34:41 -0400
lso> From: Ron Carson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
lso> Subject: [OTlist] OT's and Upper Extremity
lso> To: [email protected]
lso> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
lso> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

lso> Why do some therapists think that OT focuses on the upper extremity?

lso> I received a brochure from an OT in private practice and it states:

lso> "[OT]  focuses  on  treatment of upper extremity injuries, disorders and
lso> disease"

lso> Where  does  this come from? It certainly is not our practice framework?
lso> Is it from OT/COTA schools? If so, why?

lso> This  seems  like another example of the dichotomy of our profession. In
lso> other words, we "say" one thing but then do something totally different!

lso> Argh......

lso> Ron



lso> --

lso> "In  the  United  States, occupational therapy is ideally suited to meet
lso> the  health  needs  of  people  of all ages." [Fred Somers, AJOT, April,
lso> 2005]

lso> "The  part of convalescence that I found most profoundly humiliating and
lso> depressing  was  [OT]...  I was reduced to playing with brightly colored
lso> plastic  letters  ...  like  a three-year-old..." [AJOT, April, 2005, p.
lso> 231]




lso> ------------------------------

lso> Message: 2
lso> Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 10:49:04 -0400
lso> From: "Johnson, Arley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
lso> Subject: Re: [OTlist] OT's and Upper Extremity
lso> To: <[email protected]>
lso> Message-ID:
lso>        
lso> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
lso>         
lso> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="iso-8859-1"

lso> I think I know why. OT things are functionally based. Most of our 
functional daily activity
lso> originates with the use of our hands. Therefore, basic observation of our 
profession and the
lso> medical model's need to simplify everyone's role for the average Joe 
dictates a simplistic and
lso> narrow explanation of our profession.  Is it right? Of course not. But it 
gives our profession
lso> relevance to the outsider who may only get a cursory glance of what we do 
and it may draw them
lso> in for the full experience.

lso> Let's be honest, OT covers the spectrum of life and it entails a lot of 
information. Our
lso> charge to be the profession that rehabilitates you back into your life 
roles is not an easy
lso> task. Neither is explaining it in a manner that is understood by the 
public.

lso> Arley Johnson MS, OTR/L

lso> ?

lso> -----Original Message-----
lso> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Carson
lso> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 7:35 AM
lso> To: [email protected]
lso> Subject: [OTlist] OT's and Upper Extremity

lso> Why do some therapists think that OT focuses on the upper extremity?

lso> I received a brochure from an OT in private practice and it states:

lso> "[OT]  focuses  on  treatment of upper extremity injuries, disorders and
lso> disease"

lso> Where  does  this come from? It certainly is not our practice framework?
lso> Is it from OT/COTA schools? If so, why?

lso> This  seems  like another example of the dichotomy of our profession. In
lso> other words, we "say" one thing but then do something totally different!

lso> Argh......

lso> Ron



lso> --

lso> "In  the  United  States, occupational therapy is ideally suited to meet
lso> the  health  needs  of  people  of all ages." [Fred Somers, AJOT, April,
lso> 2005]

lso> "The  part of convalescence that I found most profoundly humiliating and
lso> depressing  was  [OT]...  I was reduced to playing with brightly colored
lso> plastic  letters  ...  like  a three-year-old..." [AJOT, April, 2005, p.
lso> 231]


lso> -- 
lso> Options?
lso>   www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com 

lso> Archive?
lso>   www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

lso> 
**************************************************************************************
lso> Enroll in Boston University's post-professional Master of Science for OTs 
Online. Gain the
lso> skills and credentials to propel your career.
lso> www.otdegree.com/otn
lso> 
**************************************************************************************


lso> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the 
personal and
lso> confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this 
message is not the
lso> intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, you
lso> are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that 
any review,
lso> dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly 
prohibited. If you have
lso> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by 
e-mail, and delete the
lso> original message.



lso> ------------------------------

lso> -- 
lso> Unsubscribe?
lso>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

lso> Change options?
lso>   www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com 

lso> Archive?
lso>   www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

lso> Help?
lso>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



lso> End of OTlist Digest, Vol 31, Issue 8
lso> *************************************


lso> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
lso> for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
lso> and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
lso> distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
lso> contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
lso> message.


-- 
Options?
  www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com 

Archive?
  www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

**************************************************************************************
Enroll in Boston University's post-professional Master of Science for OTs 
Online. Gain the skills and credentials to propel your career.
www.otdegree.com/otn
**************************************************************************************

Reply via email to